Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;19(6):608-15.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0002. Epub 2014 May 2.

Measures of outcome in metastatic breast cancer: insights from a real-world scenario

Affiliations

Measures of outcome in metastatic breast cancer: insights from a real-world scenario

Marta Bonotto et al. Oncologist. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

No gold standard treatment exists for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Clinical decision making is based on knowledge of prognostic and predictive factors that are extrapolated from clinical trials and, sometimes, are not reliably transferable to a real-world scenario. Moreover, misalignment between endpoints used in drug development and measures of outcome in clinical practice has been noted. The roles of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as primary endpoints in the context of clinical trials are the subjects of lively debate. Information about these parameters in routine clinical practice is potentially useful to design new studies and/or to interpret the results of clinical research. This study analyzed the impact of patient and tumor characteristics on the major measures of outcome across different lines of treatment in a cohort of 472 patients treated for MBC. OS, PFS, and postprogression survival (PPS) were analyzed. The study showed how biological and clinical characteristics may have different prognostic value across different lines of therapy for MBC. After first-line treatment, the median PPS of luminal A, luminal B, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive groups was longer than 12 months. The choice of OS as a primary endpoint for clinical trials could not be appropriate with these subtypes. In contrast, OS could be an appropriate endpoint when PPS is expected to be low (e.g., triple-negative subtype after the first line; other subtypes after the third line). The potential implications of these findings are clinical and methodological.

Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Outcome measure; Surrogate endpoint; Survival analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Comparison of OS, PFS at first line of treatment, and PPS after the first line of treatment between different immunophenotypes. Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PPS, postprogression survival.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
HER2+ population, comparison between hormone receptor-positive and -negative subgroups. Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

References

    1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E. Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:765–781. - PubMed
    1. O’Shaughnessy J. Extending survival with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. The Oncologist. 2005;10(suppl 3):20–29. - PubMed
    1. Greenberg PA, Hortobagyi GN, Smith TL, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2197–2205. - PubMed
    1. Verma S, Clemons M. First-line treatment options for patients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: The impact of modern adjuvant chemotherapy. The Oncologist. 2007;12:785–797. - PubMed

Publication types