Prospective, randomized study of cutting balloon angioplasty versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of hemodialysis access stenoses
- PMID: 24794277
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.002
Prospective, randomized study of cutting balloon angioplasty versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of hemodialysis access stenoses
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this trial was to compare the rates of patency achieved by cutting and conventional balloon angioplasty to treat hemodialysis access stenoses.
Methods: End-stage renal failure patients (at three tertiary referral centers) with significant hemodialysis access stenoses were prospectively randomized to have percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) by either cutting or conventional balloons. Patients with more than one hemodynamically significant stenosis were excluded. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the primary assisted patency rates for the two groups.
Results: The study randomized 623 patients into two groups, and the duration of follow-up was 15 ± 3 months. In the cutting balloon angioplasty group, the clinical success rate was 89% (282 of 316 stenoses). In the conventional balloon angioplasty group, the clinical success rate was 86% (265 of 307 stenoses; P = .637). Assisted primary patency for cutting PTA was statistically significantly higher at 6 months and 1 year (86% and 63%) than that for conventional PTA (56% and 37%, respectively; P = .037) in the treatment of stenosis of the graft-to-vein anastomosis. In the venous stenosis subgroup, equivalent primary assisted patency at 6 months and 1 year was observed for cutting PTA (84% and 55%) and conventional PTA (70% and 46%, respectively; P = .360). In the intragraft stenosis subgroup, primary assisted patency was equivalent at 6 months and 1 year for cutting PTA (67% and 39%) and conventional PTA (62% and 49%, respectively; P = .371). In the arterial anastomotic stenosis subgroup, assisted primary patency at 6 months and 1 year was equivalent for cutting PTA (70% and 30%) and conventional PTA (75% and 33%, respectively; P = .921).
Conclusions: Cutting balloon angioplasty proved to be a safe and effective treatment of graft-to-vein anastomotic stenosis, with significantly higher patency than that of conventional balloon angioplasty.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Regarding "Prospective, randomized study of cutting balloon angioplasty versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of hemodialysis access stenoses".J Vasc Surg. 2014 Oct;60(4):1122. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.091. J Vasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 25260481 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Randomized clinical trial of cutting balloon angioplasty versus high-pressure balloon angioplasty in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula stenoses resistant to conventional balloon angioplasty.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):190-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Dec 5. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24315548 Clinical Trial.
-
Primary patency with cutting and conventional balloon angioplasty for different types of hemodialysis access stenosis.Radiology. 2007 May;243(2):578-87. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2432051232. Epub 2007 Mar 30. Radiology. 2007. PMID: 17400756 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term outcomes of primary angioplasty and primary stenting of central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients.J Vasc Surg. 2007 Apr;45(4):776-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.046. J Vasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17398386
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of plain versus drug-eluting balloon angioplasty in the treatment of juxta-anastomotic hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula stenosis.J Vasc Surg. 2020 Mar;71(3):1046-1054.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.075. J Vasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 32089200
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of drug-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for dialysis access stenosis.J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):970-979.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.082. J Vasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 31445651
Cited by
-
Dialysis Access Anatomy and Interventions: A Primer.Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016 Mar;33(1):52-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1578811. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27011428 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contemporary review of management techniques for cephalic arch stenosis in hemodialysis.Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2176166. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2176166. Ren Fail. 2023. PMID: 36748927 Free PMC article.
-
Central vein stenosis: a rare cause of orbital congestion in a haemodialysis patient.BMJ Case Rep. 2023 Aug 29;16(8):e254999. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-254999. BMJ Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37643820 Free PMC article.
-
Dual outflow upper arm arteriovenous fistula: An effective technique to prevent cephalic arch stenosis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 1;102(48):e36419. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036419. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 38050217 Free PMC article.
-
Choosing the right treatment for the right lesion, part I: a narrative review of the role of plain balloon angioplasty in dialysis access maintenance.Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023 Feb 28;13(1):212-232. doi: 10.21037/cdt-22-375. Epub 2022 Nov 18. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023. PMID: 36864950 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical