Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;30(1):1-5.
doi: 10.5487/TR.2014.30.1.001.

Human tumor xenograft models for preclinical assessment of anticancer drug development

Affiliations

Human tumor xenograft models for preclinical assessment of anticancer drug development

Joohee Jung. Toxicol Res. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Xenograft models of human cancer play an important role in the screening and evaluation of candidates for new anticancer agents. The models, which are derived from human tumor cell lines and are classified according to the transplant site, such as ectopic xenograft and orthotopic xenograft, are still utilized to evaluate therapeutic efficacy and toxicity. The metastasis model is modified for the evaluation and prediction of cancer progression. Recently, animal models are made from patient-derived tumor tissue. The patient-derived tumor xenograft models with physiological characters similar to those of patients have been established for personalized medicine. In the discovery of anticancer drugs, standard animal models save time and money and provide evidence to support clinical trials. The current strategy for using xenograft models as an informative tool is introduced.

Keywords: Anticancer drug development; In vivo; Mouse; Xenograft model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Various xenograft models. (A) Ectopic xenograft model. The cancer cells were subcutaneously injected into Balb/c nude mice. After approximately two weeks, the tumor was observed. (B) Orthotopic xenograft model. Human non-small cell lung cancer cells (A549 cells) were injected into the thoracic cavity of Balb/c nude mice. Tumor was observed by in vivo optical imaging. Isolated lung tissue was stained and observed by microscopy. (C) Metastasis model. Luciferase-expressing cancer cells were injected into the tail vein. Tumor was observed by in vivo optical imaging. (D) Patient-derived tumor xenograft model. Patient-derived tumor tissues were transplanted into the SCID mouse.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Teicher B.A., Andrews P.A. Anticancer drug development guide; preclinical screening, clinical trials, and approval. 2nd edition. Humana Press; New Jersey: (2004). pp. 99–123.
    1. Cheon D.J., Orsulic S. Mouse models of cancer. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. (2011);6:95–119. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.3.121806.154244. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suggitt M., Bibby M.C. 50 years of preclinical anticancer drug screening: empirical to target-driven approaches. Clin. Cancer Res. (2005);11:971–981. - PubMed
    1. Frese K.K., Tuveson D.A. Maximizing mouse cancer models. Nat. Rev. Cancer. (2007);7:645–658. doi: 10.1038/nrc2192. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharpless N.E., Depinho R.A. The mighty mouse: genetically engineered mouse models in cancer drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. (2006);5:741–754. doi: 10.1038/nrd2110. - DOI - PubMed