How the Brain Process Stimulus-Response Conflict? New Insights from Lateralized Readiness Potentials Scalp Topography and Reaction Times
- PMID: 24795834
- PMCID: PMC4006818
- DOI: 10.4236/jbbs.2013.31014
How the Brain Process Stimulus-Response Conflict? New Insights from Lateralized Readiness Potentials Scalp Topography and Reaction Times
Abstract
Stimulus-Response Compatibility (SRC) refers to the fact that some tasks are performed easier and better than others because of the way stimuli and responses are paired with each other. To assess the brain responses to stimulus-response conflicts, we investigated the behavioral (accuracy and Reaction Times: RTs) as well as the physiological response (Lateralized Readiness Potentials: LRP) modulations in a positional blocked and a conditional mixed design in twelve university students. Results revealed that the performance was less accurate and the RTs, as well as the LRP onset, were delayed under the mixed conditional design. A greater compatibility effect was also noted on accuracy, RTs and LRP onset latency in the mixed design. Consistent with these findings, smaller peak activation at fronto-central areas suggests that more selective inhibition is needed in a mixed design context. Despite a smaller activation, the topographical distribution is similar in both designs. These results indicate that the translation time between stimulus- and response codes are greater under the mixed instruction, while the similar LRP topography suggests that common neural structures underlie LRPs in response to both type of designs.
Keywords: Lateralized Readiness Potentials; Mixed-Blocked Designs; Reaction Times; Stimulus Response-Compatibility.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Cognitive-behavioral therapy induces sensorimotor and specific electrocortical changes in chronic tic and Tourette's disorder.Neuropsychologia. 2015 Dec;79(Pt B):310-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 27. Neuropsychologia. 2015. PMID: 26022060
-
Similarities and differences between interference from stimulus position and from direction of an arrow: behavioral and event-related potential measures.Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Nov;90(2):180-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 13. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013. PMID: 23856354
-
Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.Brain Res. 2008 Jan 16;1189:179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.096. Epub 2007 Nov 12. Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18048011
-
Separating stimulus-driven and response-related LRP components with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE).Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan;50(1):70-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01479.x. Epub 2012 Nov 15. Psychophysiology. 2013. PMID: 23153305
-
Proactive and reactive control in S-R compatibility: a brain potential analysis.Psychophysiology. 2012 Jun;49(6):756-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01368.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23. Psychophysiology. 2012. PMID: 22524194
References
-
- Simon JR. The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional Cue on Human Information Processing. In: Proctor RW, editor. Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1990. pp. 31–86.
-
- Wickens CD, Vidulich M, Sandry-Garza D. Principles of S-C-R Compatibility with Spatial and Verbal Tasks: The Role of Display-Control Location and Voice-Interactive Display-Control Interfacing. Human Factors. 1984;26(5):533–543. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous