Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr 22:2:e363.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.363. eCollection 2014.

The perception of shape from shading in a new light

Affiliations

The perception of shape from shading in a new light

Michael J Proulx. PeerJ. .

Abstract

How do humans see three-dimensional shape based on two-dimensional shading? Much research has assumed that a 'light from above' bias solves the ambiguity of shape from shading. Counter to the 'light from above' bias, studies of Bayesian priors have found that such a bias can be swayed by other light cues. Despite the persuasive power of the Bayesian models, many new studies and books cite the original 'light from above' findings. Here I present a version of the Bayesian result that can be experienced. The perception of shape-from-shading was found here to be influenced by an external light source, even when the light was obstructed and did not directly illuminate a two-dimensional stimulus. The results imply that this effect is robust and not low-level in nature. The perception of shape from shading is not necessarily based on a hard-wired internal representation of lighting direction, but rather assesses the direction of lighting in the scene adaptively. Here, for the first time, is an experiential opportunity to see what the Bayesian models have supported all along.

Keywords: 3D shape perception; Illusion; Shape from shading; Vision; Visual perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stimulus and results.
(A) An example stimulus. (B) Mean rating of perceived light direction versus the actual illumination direction in the room, as a function of experimental condition (Condition 1: Overhead Light; Condition 2: Light Below; Condition 3: Obstructed Light Below). 1.0 = light from above; 0.0 = light from below. Error bars are ±1 s.e.m.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams WJ. A common light-prior for visual search, shape, and reflectance judgments. Journal of Vision. 2007;7:11–17. doi: 10.1167/7.11.11. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams WJ. Frames of reference for the light-from-above prior in visual search and shape judgements. Cognition. 2008;107:137–150. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams WJ, Graf EW, Ernst MO. Experience can change the ‘light-from-above’ prior. Nature Neuroscience. 2004;7:1057–1058. doi: 10.1038/nn1312. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berbaum K, Bever T, Chung CS. Light source position in the perception of object shape. Perception. 1983;12:411–416. doi: 10.1068/p120411. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dobbins AC, Grossmann JK. Asymmetries in perception of 3D orientation. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009553. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources