Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;26(1):45-53.
doi: 10.3233/JRS-140607.

Births and male:female birth ratio in Scandinavia and the United Kingdom after the Windscale fire of October 1957

Affiliations

Births and male:female birth ratio in Scandinavia and the United Kingdom after the Windscale fire of October 1957

Victor Grech. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014.

Abstract

Aims: The Windscale (UK) fire of 1957 carried radioactive fallout according to the then prevailing wind patterns, in a North-Easterly direction across the Nordic countries, toward Norway. The male:female ratio at birth (M/F) is known to be increased after parental exposure to ionising radiation due to foetal losses that affect female more than male pregnancies. This study was carried out in order to ascertain whether the Windscale fire had any effects on M/F and birth rates in the United Kingdom and Scandinavia.

Methods: Annual live births by gender were obtained from a World Health Organization dataset. The null hypothesis was that there were no significant changes in M/F or in births in temporal association with the 1957 Windscale event in abovementioned countries.

Results: There were no significant effects on the UK and most of Scandinavia but there was a significant rise in M/F for Norway and Finland with an aggregate deficit of around 4000 births in each country.

Conclusions: A recent study suggests that the plume from the reactor extended further east than previously believed. This study confirms that contamination from the Windscale fire had a negligible impact on the UK (as measured by birth effects) but had a significant impact on births in Norway and Sweden.

Keywords: Great Britain/epidemiology; Ionizing; Scandinavia; birth Rate/*trends; infant; newborn; radiation; sex Ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Letter to the editor.
    Körblein A. Körblein A. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014;26(3):171. doi: 10.3233/JRS-140626. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014. PMID: 25214163 No abstract available.
  • Letter to the editor.
    Scherb H, Kusmierz R, Voigt K. Scherb H, et al. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014;26(3):173-4. doi: 10.3233/JRS-140627. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014. PMID: 25214164 No abstract available.
  • Response to letters to the editor.
    Grech V. Grech V. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014;26(3):175-6. doi: 10.3233/JRS-140624. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014. PMID: 25214165 No abstract available.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources