Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;52(8):578-87.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.62. Epub 2014 May 6.

Knowledge translation and implementation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review

V K Noonan  1 , D L Wolfe  2 , N P Thorogood  3 , S E Park  1 , J T Hsieh  4 , J J Eng  5 ; SCIRE Research Team
Affiliations

Knowledge translation and implementation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review

V K Noonan et al. Spinal Cord. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a systematic review examining the effectiveness of knowledge translation (KT) interventions in changing clinical practice and patient outcomes.

Methods: MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched for studies published from January 1980 to July 2012 that reported and evaluated an implemented KT intervention in spinal cord injury (SCI) care. We reviewed and summarized results from studies that documented the implemented KT intervention, its impact on changing clinician behavior and patient outcomes as well as the facilitators and barriers encountered during the implementation.

Results: A total of 13 articles featuring 10 studies were selected and abstracted from 4650 identified articles. KT interventions included developing and implementing patient care protocols, providing clinician education and incorporating outcome measures into clinical practice. The methods (or drivers) to facilitate the implementation included organizing training sessions for clinical staff, introducing computerized reminders and involving organizational leaders. The methodological quality of studies was mostly poor. Only 3 out of 10 studies evaluated the success of the implementation using statistical analyses, and all 3 reported significant behavior change. Out of the 10 studies, 6 evaluated the effect of the implementation on patient outcomes using statistical analyses, with 4 reporting significant improvements. The commonly cited facilitators and barriers were communication and resources, respectively.

Conclusion: The field of KT in SCI is in its infancy with only a few relevant publications. However, there is some evidence that KT interventions may change clinician behavior and improve patient outcomes. Future studies should ensure rigorous study methods are used to evaluate KT interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

VKN, SEP and NTP were employees of the Rick Hansen Institute at the time this manuscript was written. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of studies selected and included.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Balas EA, Boren SA. Yearbook of Medical Informatics: Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement. Schattauer; Stuttgart, Germany: 2000. - PubMed
    1. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104:510–520. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, Miceli E, Shah P. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009;89:125–135. - PubMed
    1. Copeland JM, Taylor WJ, Dean SG. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures for patients with low back pain: a survey of New Zealand physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2008;88:1492–1505. - PubMed
    1. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literatureUniversity of South Florida Louis de la Parte Florida. Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; Tampa, FL: 2005. p. 119.

Publication types

Grants and funding