Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD003968.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub4.

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Christopher Eccleston  1 , Tonya M Palermo, Amanda C de C Williams, Amy Lewandowski Holley, Stephen Morley, Emma Fisher, Emily Law
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Christopher Eccleston et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: This is an update of the original Cochrane review first published in Issue 1, 2003, and previously updated in 2009 and 2012. Chronic pain affects many children, who report severe pain, disability, and distressed mood. Psychological therapies are emerging as effective interventions to treat children with chronic or recurrent pain. This update focuses specifically on psychological therapies delivered face-to-face, adds new randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and additional data from previously included trials.

Objectives: There were three objectives to this review. First, to determine the effectiveness on clinical outcomes of pain severity, disability, depression, and anxiety of psychological therapy delivered face-to-face for chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents compared with active treatment, waiting-list, or standard medical care. Second, to evaluate the impact of psychological therapies on depression and anxiety, which were previously combined as 'mood'. Third, we assessed the risk of bias of the included studies and the quality of outcomes using the GRADE criteria.

Search methods: Searches were undertaken of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. We searched for further RCTs in the references of all identified studies, meta-analyses, and reviews. Trial registry databases were also searched. The date of most recent search was January 2014.

Selection criteria: RCTs with at least 10 participants in each arm post-treatment comparing psychological therapies with active treatment, standard medical care, or waiting-list control for children or adolescents with episodic, recurrent or persistent pain were eligible for inclusion. Only trials conducted in person (face-to-face) were considered. Studies that delivered treatment remotely were excluded from this update.

Data collection and analysis: All included studies were analysed and the quality of outcomes were assessed. All treatments were combined into one class, psychological treatments. Pain conditions were split into headache and non-headache. Both conditions were assessed on four outcomes: pain, disability, depression, and anxiety. Data were extracted at two time points; post-treatment (immediately or the earliest data available following end of treatment) and at follow-up (between three and 12 months post-treatment).

Main results: Seven papers were identified in the updated search. Of these papers, five presented new trials and two presented follow-up data for previously included trials. Five studies that were previously included in this review were excluded as therapy was delivered remotely. The review thus included a total of 37 studies. The total number of participants completing treatments was 2111. Twenty studies addressed treatments for headache (including migraine); nine for abdominal pain; two for mixed pain conditions including headache pain, two for fibromyalgia, two for recurrent abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome, and two for pain associated with sickle cell disease.Analyses revealed psychological therapies to be beneficial for children with chronic pain on seven outcomes. For headache pain, psychological therapies reduced pain post-treatment and at follow-up respectively (risk ratio (RR) 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.97 to 3.09, z = 7.87, p < 0.01, number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) = 2.94; RR 2.89, 95% CI 1.03 to 8.07, z = 2.02, p < 0.05, NNTB = 3.67). Psychological therapies also had a small beneficial effect at reducing disability in headache conditions post-treatment and at follow-up respectively (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.49, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.24, z = 3.90, p < 0.01; SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.13, z = 2.72, p < 0.01). No beneficial effect was found on depression post-treatment (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.14, z = 1.11, p > 0.05). At follow-up, only one study was eligible, therefore no analysis was possible and no conclusions can be drawn. Analyses revealed a small beneficial effect for anxiety post-treatment (SMD -0.33, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.04, z = 2.25, p < 0.05). However, this was not maintained at follow-up (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -1.00 to 0.45; z = 0.75, p > 0.05).Analyses revealed two beneficial effects of psychological treatment for children with non-headache pain. Pain was found to improve post-treatment (SMD -0.57, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.27, z = 3.74, p < 0.01), but not at follow-up (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.19, z = 0.73, p > 0.05). Psychological therapies also had a beneficial effect for disability post-treatment (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.19, z = 3.40, p < 0.01), but this was not maintained at follow-up (SMD -0.35, 95% CI -0.71 to 0.02, z = 1.87, p > 0.05). No effect was found for depression or anxiety post-treatment (SMD -0.07, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.17, z = 0.54, p > 0.05; SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.07, z = 1.33, p > 0.05) or at follow-up (SMD 0.06, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.28, z = 0.53, p > 0.05; SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.33, z = 0.32, p > 0.05).

Authors' conclusions: Psychological treatments delivered face-to-face are effective in reducing pain intensity and disability for children and adolescents (<18 years) with headache, and therapeutic gains appear to be maintained, although this should be treated with caution for the disability outcome as only two studies could be included in the follow-up analysis. Psychological therapies are also beneficial at reducing anxiety post-treatment for headache. For non-headache conditions, psychological treatments were found to be beneficial for pain and disability post-treatment but these effects were not maintained at follow-up. There is limited evidence available to estimate the effects of psychological therapies on depression and anxiety for children and adolescents with headache and non-headache pain. The conclusions of this update replicate and add to those of the previous review which found that psychological therapies were effective in reducing pain intensity for children with headache and non-headache pain conditions, and these effects were maintained at follow-up for children with headache conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Treatment versus control (headache) post‐treatment, outcome: 1.1 Pain.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of comparison: 3 Treatment versus control (non‐headache) post‐treatment, outcome: 3.1 Pain.
Analysis 1.1
Analysis 1.1
Comparison 1 Treatment versus control (headache) post‐treatment, Outcome 1 Pain.
Analysis 1.2
Analysis 1.2
Comparison 1 Treatment versus control (headache) post‐treatment, Outcome 2 Disability.
Analysis 1.3
Analysis 1.3
Comparison 1 Treatment versus control (headache) post‐treatment, Outcome 3 Depression.
Analysis 1.4
Analysis 1.4
Comparison 1 Treatment versus control (headache) post‐treatment, Outcome 4 Anxiety.
Analysis 2.1
Analysis 2.1
Comparison 2 Treatment versus control (headache) follow‐up, Outcome 1 Pain.
Analysis 2.2
Analysis 2.2
Comparison 2 Treatment versus control (headache) follow‐up, Outcome 2 Disability.
Analysis 2.3
Analysis 2.3
Comparison 2 Treatment versus control (headache) follow‐up, Outcome 3 Depression.
Analysis 2.4
Analysis 2.4
Comparison 2 Treatment versus control (headache) follow‐up, Outcome 4 Anxiety.
Analysis 3.1
Analysis 3.1
Comparison 3 Treatment versus control (non‐headache) post‐treatment, Outcome 1 Pain.
Analysis 3.2
Analysis 3.2
Comparison 3 Treatment versus control (non‐headache) post‐treatment, Outcome 2 Disability.
Analysis 3.3
Analysis 3.3
Comparison 3 Treatment versus control (non‐headache) post‐treatment, Outcome 3 Depression.
Analysis 3.4
Analysis 3.4
Comparison 3 Treatment versus control (non‐headache) post‐treatment, Outcome 4 Anxiety.
Analysis 4.1
Analysis 4.1
Comparison 4 Treatment versus control (non‐headache) follow‐up, Outcome 1 Pain.
Analysis 4.2
Analysis 4.2
Comparison 4 Treatment versus control (non‐headache) follow‐up, Outcome 2 Disability.
Analysis 4.3
Analysis 4.3
Comparison 4 Treatment versus control (non‐headache) follow‐up, Outcome 3 Depression.
Analysis 4.4
Analysis 4.4
Comparison 4 Treatment versus control (non‐headache) follow‐up, Outcome 4 Anxiety.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

    1. Abram HS, Buckloh LM, Schilling LS, Armatti Wiltrout S, Ramirez‐Garnica G, Turk WR. A randomized, controlled trail of a neurological and psychoeducational group appointment model for pediatric headaches. Children's Healthcare 2007;36:249‐65.
    1. Alfven G, Lindstrom A. A new method for the treatment of recurrent abdominal pain of prolonged negative stress origin. Acta Paediatrica 2007;96:76‐81. - PubMed
    1. Barakat LP, Schwartz LA, Salamon KS, Radcliffe J. A family‐based randomized controlled trial of pain intervention for adolescents with sickle cell disease. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 2010;32(7):540‐7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry J, Baeyer CL. Brief cognitive‐behavioral group treatment for children's headache. Clinical Journal of Pain 1997;13:215‐20. - PubMed
    1. Bussone G, Grazzi L, D'Amico D, Leone M, Andrasik F. Biofeedback‐assisted relaxation training for young adolescents with tension‐type headache: a controlled study. Cephalalgia 1988;18:463‐7. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

    1. Connelly M, Rapoff MA, Thompson N, Connelly W. Headstrong: a pilot study of a CD‐ROM intervention for recurrent pediatric headache. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2006;31:737‐47. - PubMed
    1. Fentress DW, Masek BJ, Mehegan JE, Benson H. Biofeedback and relaxation‐response training in the treatment of pediatric migraine. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1986;28:139‐46. - PubMed
    1. Hicks CL, Baeyer CL, McGrath PJ. Online psychological treatment for pediatric recurrent pain: a randomized evaluation. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2006;31:724‐36. - PubMed
    1. Koenig J, Oelkers‐Ax R, Kaess M, Parzer P, Lenzen C, Hillecke TK, et al. Specific music therapy techniques in the treatment of primary headache disorders in adolescents: a randomized attention‐placebo‐controlled trial. Journal of Pain 2013;14(10):1196‐207. - PubMed
    1. Kroner‐Herwig B, Mohn U, Pothmann R. Comparison of biofeedback and relaxation in the treatment of pediatric headache and the influence of parent involvement on outcome. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 1998;23:143‐57. - PubMed

Additional references

    1. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck‐Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiolgy 2011;64:401‐6. - PubMed
    1. Bursch B, Walco GA, Zeltzer L. Clinical assessment and management of chronic pain and pain‐associated disability syndrome. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 1998;19:45‐53. - PubMed
    1. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992;112(1):155‐9. - PubMed
    1. Eccleston C, Malleson PN, Clinch J, Connell H, Sourbut C. Chronic pain in adolescents: evaluation of a programme of interdisciplinary cognitive behaviour therapy. Archives of Diseases in Childhood 2003;88:881‐5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fearon P, Hotopf M. Relation between headache in childhood and physical and psychiatric symptoms in adulthood: national birth cohort study. BMJ 2001;322:1145. - PMC - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

    1. Eccleston C, Yorke L, Morley S, Williams ACDC, Mastroyannopoulou A. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003968] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eccleston C, Palermo TM, Williams ACDC, Lewandowski A, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eccleston C, Palermo TM, Williams ACDC, Lewandowski A, Morley S, Fisher E, et al. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed