Is it possible to change phenotype progression in Crohn's disease in the era of immunomodulators? Predictive factors of phenotype progression
- PMID: 24796767
- DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.97
Is it possible to change phenotype progression in Crohn's disease in the era of immunomodulators? Predictive factors of phenotype progression
Abstract
Objectives: Crohn's disease (CD) induces cumulative structural damage, initially characterized by a non-stenosing non-penetrating behavior (B1) with progression over time to a fibro-stenosing (B2) and/or penetrating phenotype (B3). Our aim was to assess the long-term evolution of disease behavior of CD and determine what factors predict phenotype progression.
Methods: This was a study based on prospectively collected data from a CD database in an inflammatory bowel disease outpatient clinic. B1 corresponds to a non-stenosing non-penetrating disease, B2 to a stenosing behavior, and B3 to a penetrating one.
Results: Seven hundred and thirty-six patients with CD (368 female) were followed up for 12.3 years (± 8.4), with 87.0% of them exhibiting B1 phenotype at diagnosis. Of these patients, 28.5% progressed to B2 phenotype and 23.5% to B3. Fifty percent of the patients started azathioprine treatment before phenotype change and 13.9% started anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) treatment before phenotype change. Monotherapy with azathioprine before phenotype change as well as combination therapy with azathioprine/anti-TNFα before phenotype change delayed disease progression (B1-B2 or B3) in comparison with patients who did not receive treatment (P<0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression was lower for both monotherapy with azathioprine (HR: 0.15, P<0.001) or combination therapy with anti-TNFα (HR: 0.33, P<0.001). Upper gastrointestinal tract involvement, male gender, and steroid use were associated with an early progression of phenotype from B1 to B2 or B3 (P<0.001). The HR for disease progression was higher in patients who used steroids without criteria of dependence or resistance (HR: 2.67, P<0.001) and was even higher in patients with criteria of dependence or resistance (HR: 6.44, P<0.001). Longer delays between CD diagnosis and beginning of therapy with azathioprine and/or anti-TNFα were associated with disease progression. The longer the duration of treatment, the less likely the disease progression.
Conclusions: Monotherapy with azathioprine before behavior change as well as combination therapy with azathioprine and anti-TNFα before behavior change delays phenotype progression of CD, whereas upper gastrointestinal tract involvement, male gender, and steroid use with or without criteria of steroid dependence are associated with a higher risk for disease progression.
Comment in
-
Thiopurines and the natural course of Crohn's disease: did we finally find the right therapeutic target?Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;109(7):1037-40. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.162. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24989094
-
The importance of accounting for immortal time bias in pharmacoepidemiologic analyses.Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;110(2):349. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.372. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25646915 No abstract available.
-
Response to Targownik.Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;110(2):349-51. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.376. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25646916 No abstract available.
-
Response to Magro et al.Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun;110(6):931-2. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.131. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26052771 No abstract available.
-
Response to Irwin et al.Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun;110(6):933-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.134. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26052772 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
