Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jun;7(4):387-94.
doi: 10.1007/s12265-014-9569-1. Epub 2014 May 6.

Minimally invasive valve surgery

Affiliations
Review

Minimally invasive valve surgery

Nicolas H Pope et al. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Cardiac valve surgery is life saving for many patients. The advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques has historically allowed for improvement in both postoperative convalescence and important clinical outcomes. The development of minimally invasive cardiac valve repair and replacement surgery over the past decade is poised to revolutionize the care of cardiac valve patients. Here, we present a review of the history and current trends in minimally invasive aortic and mitral valve repair and replacement, including the development of sutureless bioprosthetic valves.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incisions for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. J-hemisternotomy (A), L-hemisternotomy (B), inverted-T partial sternotomy (C), right anterior thoracotomy (D).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mini-AVR through a J-hemisternotomy revealing the exposed ascending aorta (A, arrow).Following cross-clamp placement, an aortotomy is made and the native valve is explanted (B). Skin closure following completion of the procedure (C). Ruler on the marking pen denotes 4 cm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Right 3rd intercostal anterior mini-thoracotomy for “port-access” mitral valve repair. View through the mini-thoracotomy (A) is greatly augmented by a laterally placed thoracoscope. Sutures are placed circumferentially (B) to secure a semi-rigid annuloplasty ring (C). Incision is seen 6 weeks postoperatively (arrow, D).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Traditional sutured prosthetic aortic valve placement through a minimally invasive J-hemisternotomy (A). Percival S self-expanding aortic tissue valve with Sinus of Valsalva struts (B, from www.sorin.com/product/perceval-s). Perceval S valve placed in the aortic position (C, arrow).

References

    1. Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, Bichell DP, Rosborough DM, Sears SP, Aranki SF. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Annals of surgery. 1997;226(4):421–426. discussion 427–428. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cosgrove DM, 3rd, Sabik JF, Navia JL. Minimally invasive valve operations. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1998;65(6):1535–1538. discussion 1538–1539. - PubMed
    1. Johnston WF, Ailawadi G. Surgical management of minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. 2012;16(1):41–51. - PubMed
    1. LaPar DJ, Ailawadi G, Bhamidipati CM, Stukenborg G, Crosby IK, Kern JA, Kron IL. Small prosthesis size in aortic valve replacement does not affect mortality. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2011;92(3):880–888. discussion 888. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cosgrove DM, 3rd, Sabik JF. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1996;62(2):596–597. - PubMed

MeSH terms