Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 3;124(1):49-62.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-02-556399. Epub 2014 May 5.

Development of a comprehensive prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Affiliations

Development of a comprehensive prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Natali Pflug et al. Blood. .

Abstract

In addition to clinical staging, a number of biomarkers predicting overall survival (OS) have been identified in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The multiplicity of markers, limited information on their independent prognostic value, and a lack of understanding of how to interpret discordant markers are major barriers to use in routine clinical practice. We therefore performed an analysis of 23 prognostic markers based on prospectively collected data from 1948 CLL patients participating in phase 3 trials of the German CLL Study Group to develop a comprehensive prognostic index. A multivariable Cox regression model identified 8 independent predictors of OS: sex, age, ECOG status, del(17p), del(11q), IGHV mutation status, serum β2-microglobulin, and serum thymidine kinase. Using a weighted grading system, a prognostic index was derived that separated 4 risk categories with 5-year OS ranging from 18.7% to 95.2% and having a C-statistic of 0.75. The index stratified OS within all analyzed subgroups, including all Rai/Binet stages. The validity of the index was externally confirmed in a series of 676 newly diagnosed CLL patients from Mayo Clinic. Using this multistep process including external validation, we developed a comprehensive prognostic index with high discriminatory power and prognostic significance on the individual patient level. The studies were registered as follows: CLL1 trial (NCT00262782, http://clinicaltrials.gov), CLL4 trial (ISRCTN 75653261, http://www.controlled-trials.com), and CLL8 trial (NCT00281918, http://clinicaltrials.gov).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The survival curves according to clinical staging in the training data set. (A) OS of Binet stages within the training data set (N = 1863); (B) OS of Rai stages within the training data set (N = 1863).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time-to-event curves according to the prognostic index in the training data set. (A) OS of risk groups of the training data set according to the prognostic index (score population: N = 1223); (B) PFS of patients starting treatment according to the prognostic index (training data set N = 807); (C) TFS of untreated patients according to the prognostic index (training data set N = 416).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival curves of the Binet and Rai stages by prognostic index risk categories in the training data set. (A) Patients in Binet stage A (N = 531); (B) Patients in Binet stage B (N = 443); (C) Patients in Binet stage C (N = 241); (D) Patients in Rai stage 0 (N = 232); (E) Patients in Rai stage I/II (N = 702); (F) Patients in Rai stage III/IV (N = 281).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Survival curves of genetic subgroups by prognostic index risk categories in the training data set. (A) OS of patients with unmutated IGHV mutation status within risk groups of the prognostic index (training data set N = 645); (B) OS of patients with deletion 17p13 within risk groups of the prognostic index (training data set N = 74).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Time-to-event curves according to the prognostic index in the validation data set. (A) OS of risk groups of the Mayo validation cohort according to the prognostic index (N = 673); (B) TFS of the Mayo validation cohort according to the prognostic index (N = 673).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Survival curves of Rai stages by prognostic index risk categories in the validation data set. (A) Patients in Rai stage 0 (N = 384); (B) Patients in rai stage I/II (N = 269); (C) Patients in Rai stage III/IV (N = 20).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Survival curves of genetic subgroups by prognostic index risk categories in the validation data set. (A) OS of patients with unmutated IGHV mutation status within risk groups of the prognostic index (validation data set N = 292); (B) OS of patients with deletion 17p13 withihn risk groups of the prognostic index (validation data set N = 29).

Comment in

References

    1. Müller-Hermelink H, Montserrat E, Catovsky D, Campo E, Harris N, Stein H. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/small lymphocytic leukemia. In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al., editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Lymphoid Tissues Lyon. France: IARC; 2008. pp. 180–182.
    1. Dighiero G, Hamblin TJ. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Lancet. 2008;371(9617):1017–1029. - PubMed
    1. Cramer P, Hallek M. Prognostic factors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia-what do we need to know? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(1):38–47. - PubMed
    1. Binet JL, Auquier A, Dighiero G, et al. A new prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia derived from a multivariate survival analysis. Cancer. 1981;48(1):198–206. - PubMed
    1. Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite EP, Chanana AD, Levy RN, Pasternack BS. Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1975;46(2):219–234. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data