Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;58(7):3976-82.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00124-14. Epub 2014 May 5.

Surotomycin demonstrates low in vitro frequency of resistance and rapid bactericidal activity in Clostridium difficile, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium

Affiliations

Surotomycin demonstrates low in vitro frequency of resistance and rapid bactericidal activity in Clostridium difficile, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium

Carmela T M Mascio et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Surotomycin (CB-183,315) is an orally administered, minimally absorbed, selective bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide in phase 3 development for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the emergence of resistance in C. difficile (ATCC 700057 and three recent clinical isolates from the restriction endonuclease analysis groups BI, BK, and K), vancomycin-susceptible (VS) Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 49452), vancomycin-resistant (VR) E. faecalis (ATCC 700802), VS Enterococcus faecium (ATCC 6569), and VR E. faecium (ATCC 51559) under anaerobic conditions. The rate of spontaneous resistance was below the limit of detection (<10(-8) to <10(-9)) for surotomycin at 16 and 32× the MIC for all isolates tested. Under selective pressure by serial passage, C. difficile grew in a maximum of 4 μg/ml surotomycin (final MICs of 2 to 8 μg/ml [4- to 16-fold higher than those of the naive control]) at day 15, with the exception of the C. difficile BK strain, which grew in 16 to 32 μg/ml (final MICs of 8 to 32 μg/ml [16- to 64-fold higher than those of the naive control]). Enterococci remained relatively unchanged over 15 days, growing in a maximum of 8 μg/ml surotomycin (final MICs of 2 to 16 μg/ml [8- to 64-fold higher than those of the naive control]). Of the isolates tested, no cross-resistance to vancomycin, rifampin, ampicillin, metronidazole, or moxifloxacin was observed. Surotomycin at 20× MIC demonstrated equally rapid bactericidal activity (≥ 3-log-unit reduction in CFU/ml in ≤ 8 h) against naive and reduced-susceptibility isolates of C. difficile, VS Enterococcus (VSE), and VR Enterococcus (VRE), except for C. difficile BK (2.6-log-unit reductions for both). These results suggest that emergence of resistance to surotomycin against C. difficile, E. faecalis, and E. faecium is likely to be rare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Serial passage of C. difficile BI, BK, K, and QC strains against surotomycin, vancomycin, and rifampin. The concentration of drug permitting growth is shown on the y axes, and time (in days) is shown on the x axes.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Serial passage of vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant E. faecalis and E. faecium against surotomycin, vancomycin, and rifampin.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Time-kill analysis of surotomycin, vancomycin, and metronidazole at 20× the MIC against naive and reduced-susceptibility isolates of C. difficile BI (A) and BK (B). The surotomycin MICs for naive and reduced-susceptibility isolates of C. difficile BI were 0.5 and 8 μg/ml, respectively, and the surotomycin MICs for naive and reduced-susceptibility isolates of C. difficile BK were 0.5 and 32 μg/ml, respectively.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Time-kill analysis of surotomycin and vancomycin at 20× the MIC against naive and reduced-susceptibility isolates of VSEfs. The surotomycin MICs for naive and reduced-susceptibility isolates of VSEfs were 0.5 and 2 μg/ml, respectively.

References

    1. Kelly CP, Pothoulakis C, LaMont JT. 1994. Clostridium difficile colitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 330:257–262. 10.1056/NEJM199401273300406 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartlett JG. 2002. Clinical practice. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:334–339. 10.1056/NEJMcp011603 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouza E. 2012. Consequences of Clostridium difficile infection: understanding the healthcare burden. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18(Suppl 6):5–12. 10.1111/1469-0691.12064 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiegand PN, Nathwani D, Wilcox MH, Stephens J, Shelbaya A, Haider S. 2012. Clinical and economic burden of Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a systematic review of healthcare-facility-acquired infection. J. Hosp. Infect. 81:1–14. 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.02.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RC, Jr, Kazakova SV, Sambol SP, Johnson S, Gerding DN. 2005. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 353:2433–2441. 10.1056/NEJMoa051590 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources