Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul;58(7):4014-9.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02521-14. Epub 2014 May 5.

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter safety and efficacy study of rifalazil compared with azithromycin for treatment of uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter safety and efficacy study of rifalazil compared with azithromycin for treatment of uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women

William M Geisler et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

A randomized, double-blind study comparing single-dose chlamydia therapies of oral rifalazil (25 mg) and azithromycin (1 g) was conducted in 82 women with uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. The microbiologic cure rate of C. trachomatis with rifalazil (n = 33) was 84.8% at the visit on day 22 to 26 (test-of-cure visit), versus 92.1% with azithromycin (n = 38), and the number of treatment failures in each group was 5 and 3, respectively. The difference in cure rate was -7.3%, with a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of -22.5, and thus, noninferiority was not established at the prespecified margin (lower limit of CI of -15%). The overall treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and treatment-related TEAE rates were lower in the rifalazil group (68% and 55%) than in the azithromycin group (71% and 62%), respectively. Subjects classified as treatment failures at day 22 to 26 had a lower mean plasma concentration of rifalazil at the visit on day 8 to 12 than those classified as treatment cures, but this difference was not significant; however, the levels were similar for both groups at the visit on day 22 to 26. A single 25-mg dose of rifalazil was well tolerated and eradicated C. trachomatis in most of these women with uncomplicated genital C. trachomatis infection. (The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under registration no. NCT01631201).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Disposition of subjects.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Rifalazil plasma concentration by cure or noncure. Box plot summaries of rifalazil plasma concentrations (dots) in women cured versus the concentrations in those not cured at visit 2 (day 8 to 12) (left) and visit 3 (day 22 to 26) (right). Box lines represent median values and interquartile ranges. Also shown are dashed lines connecting mean plasma concentrations (⊗) of those cured and not cured at the respective visits.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance (reported in 2012). CDC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats12/Surv2012.pdf
    1. Nyirjesy P. 2001. Nongonococcal and nonchlamydial cervicitis. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 3:540–545. 10.1007/s11908-001-0092-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2010. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recommend. Rep. 59(RR-12):1–116 - PubMed
    1. Lau C-Y, Qureshi AK. 2002. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for genital chlamydial infections: a meta analysis of randomized clinical trials. Sex. Transm. Dis. 29:497–502. 10.1097/00007435-200209000-00001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batteiger BE, Tu W, Ofner S, Van Der Pol B, Stothard DR, Orr DP, Katz BP, Fortenberry JD. 2010. Repeated Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in adolescent women. J. Infect. Dis. 201:42–51. 10.1086/648734 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data