Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 May 5;9(5):e96683.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096683. eCollection 2014.

Effectiveness of a training course for general practice nurses in motivation support in type 2 diabetes care: a cluster-randomised trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of a training course for general practice nurses in motivation support in type 2 diabetes care: a cluster-randomised trial

Lise Juul et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes is a common metabolic disease with the potential for prevention of complications. The prevention requires a high level of lasting actions from the patients, which may be burdensome. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a training course for general practice nurses in motivation support at 18 months follow-up in the affiliated type 2 diabetes population.

Methods: Forty general practices with nurse-led diabetes consultations from the area of Aarhus, Denmark were randomised 1∶1 to either intervention or usual practice. Intervention practices were offered a 16-hour Self-determination theory-based course including communication training for general practice nurses delivered over 10 months. The affiliated diabetes populations (aged 40-74 years) were identified from registers (intervention n = 2,005; usual n = 2,029). Primary outcomes were register-based glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) -, total cholesterol levels, and well-being measured by the Problem Areas In Diabetes scale (PAID) and the mental component summary score, SF12 (SF12, mcs). Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. Predefined subgroups analyses were performed.

Results: The differences between the intervention- and the control practices' mean HbA1c and total cholesterol at follow-up adjusted for baseline values and clustering were respectively: -0.02%-points (95% CI: -0.11 to 0.07; p: 0.67); 0.08 mmol/l (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.15; p: 0.02). Differences in median scores adjusted for clustering were for PAID: 1.25; p = 0.31 and SF12, mcs: 0.99; p = 0.15. Women in intervention practices differed from women in usual practices on mean HbA1c: -0.12%-points (-0.23 to -0.02; p = 0.02) and SF12, mcs: 2.6; p = 0.01.

Conclusions: Offering a training course for general practice nurses in applying the Self-determination theory in current type 2 diabetes care had no effect compared with usual practice measured by HbA1c and total cholesterol levels and the well-being at 18 months of follow-up in a comprehensive register-based diabetes population. Subgroup analyses suggested a possible effect in women, which deserves further attention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT01187069).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart.
The inclusion of general practices and the associated diabetes populations in a trial evaluating the effectiveness of a training course for general practice nurses in applying Self-determination theory in current type 2 diabetes care, DK 2011.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Timeframe of the trial.
The trial evaluated the effectiveness of a training course for general practice nurses in applying Self-determination theory in current type 2 diabetes care, DK.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Subgroup analyses.
Differences in mean HbA1c adjusted for baseline values and cluster effect in subgroups in intervention practices compared with usual practices 18 months after the core intervention, DK 2011.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Evaluation of the training course on the nurses’ self-perceived autonomy supportive competences.
The number of nurses distributed on their scores from 1–10 (1 = rarely, 10 = always) before (below the line) and 11 months after (above the line) the training course for each autonomy supportive competence, DK 2011.

References

    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, et al. (2000) Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 321: 405–412. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laakso M (2001) Cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: challenge for treatment and prevention. J Intern Med 249: 225–235. - PubMed
    1. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M (1998) Mortality from coronary. heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 339: 229–234. - PubMed
    1. Ryden L, Standl E, Bartnik M, Van den Berghe G, Betteridge J, et al. (2007) Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: executive summary. The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur Heart J 28: 88–136. - PubMed
    1. Juul L, Maindal HT, Frydenberg M, Kristensen JK, Sandbaek A (2012) Quality of type 2 diabetes management in general practice is associated with involvement of general practice nurses. Prim Care Diabetes 6: 221–228. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data