Relationships between masticatory rhythmicity, body mass and cephalometrically-determined aesthetic and functional variables during development in humans
- PMID: 24798980
- DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.04.011
Relationships between masticatory rhythmicity, body mass and cephalometrically-determined aesthetic and functional variables during development in humans
Abstract
Objective: We studied the relationship between chewing rhythmicity, craniomandibular morphology, and age in humans.
Design: Sixty subjects (10M:10F/group×three age groups, viz., 4-8, 10-14, and 17-21 years) participated. Subjects chewed gum for 2min while jaw movements in the frontal plane were videorecorded. Mean and variation in mean chewing cycle duration (TC) were quantified using maximum opening to maximum opening as cycle boundaries. Five "aesthetic" cephalometric variables (e.g., ANB) and seven "functional" variables (e.g., jaw length) were quantified from subjects' lateral cephalographs. Simple linear regression models and several multivariate analyses were used in comparisons.
Results: Mean TC increased and variation in TC decreased significantly with age. Body mass correlated with age, height, TC, all seven "functional" variables and only two "aesthetic" variables. Mean TC was correlated significantly with jaw length, distance from condylion to first molar point, distance from gonion to zygomatic arch, and distance from hyoid to menton.
Conclusions: TC appeared to adapt with age. Although TC scaled most significantly with age, it is more likely that TC is mechanistically linked to jaw length or size. The decrease in TC variation with age suggests improved efficiency. TC did not scale with "aesthetic" variables, suggesting that these do not impact chewing rate; however, clinical procedures that impact jaw length may. The negative allometric scaling of TC with "functional" variables may reflect the pedomorphic jaw and face of humans. Further human studies will provide insights into the nature of scaling and adaptation of rhythmic chewing during development.
Keywords: Allometry; Cephalometrics; Chewing gum; Development; Mastication; Morphometrics.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Comparisons of chewing rhythm, craniomandibular morphology, body mass and height between mothers and their biological daughters.Arch Oral Biol. 2015 Nov;60(11):1667-74. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 12. Arch Oral Biol. 2015. PMID: 26363460
-
Intraspecific scaling of chewing cycle duration in three species of domestic ungulates.J Exp Biol. 2011 Jan 1;214(Pt 1):104-12. doi: 10.1242/jeb.043646. J Exp Biol. 2011. PMID: 21147974
-
Relationship between masticatory rhythm, body mass and mandibular morphology in primates.Arch Oral Biol. 2013 Sep;58(9):1084-91. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 18. Arch Oral Biol. 2013. PMID: 23518237
-
Relationship between anteroposterior maxillomandibular morphology and masticatory jaw movement patterns.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Mar;115(3):258-66. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70327-6. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999. PMID: 10066973
-
Adaptation of healthy mastication to factors pertaining to the individual or to the food.Physiol Behav. 2006 Aug 30;89(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.02.013. Epub 2006 Apr 3. Physiol Behav. 2006. PMID: 16581096 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources