Prediction of human's ability in sound localization based on the statistical properties of spike trains along the brainstem auditory pathway
- PMID: 24799888
- PMCID: PMC3988722
- DOI: 10.1155/2014/575716
Prediction of human's ability in sound localization based on the statistical properties of spike trains along the brainstem auditory pathway
Abstract
The minimum audible angle test which is commonly used for evaluating human localization ability depends on interaural time delay, interaural level differences, and spectral information about the acoustic stimulus. These physical properties are estimated at different stages along the brainstem auditory pathway. The interaural time delay is ambiguous at certain frequencies, thus confusion arises as to the source of these frequencies. It is assumed that in a typical minimum audible angle experiment, the brain acts as an unbiased optimal estimator and thus the human performance can be obtained by deriving optimal lower bounds. Two types of lower bounds are tested: the Cramer-Rao and the Barankin. The Cramer-Rao bound only takes into account the approximation of the true direction of the stimulus; the Barankin bound considers other possible directions that arise from the ambiguous phase information. These lower bounds are derived at the output of the auditory nerve and of the superior olivary complex where binaural cues are estimated. An agreement between human experimental data was obtained only when the superior olivary complex was considered and the Barankin lower bound was used. This result suggests that sound localization is estimated by the auditory nuclei using ambiguous binaural information.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive.J Neurophysiol. 1996 Oct;76(4):2137-56. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.4.2137. J Neurophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8899590
-
Transformation of binaural response properties in the ascending auditory pathway: influence of time-varying interaural phase disparity.J Neurophysiol. 1998 Dec;80(6):3062-76. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.3062. J Neurophysiol. 1998. PMID: 9862906
-
Evidence for separate processing in the human brainstem of interaural intensity and temporal disparities for sound lateralization.Hear Res. 1997 Jun;108(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00033-6. Hear Res. 1997. PMID: 9213116
-
Neuronal specializations for the processing of interaural difference cues in the chick.Front Neural Circuits. 2014 May 9;8:47. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00047. eCollection 2014. Front Neural Circuits. 2014. PMID: 24847212 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Creating a sense of auditory space.J Physiol. 2005 Jul 1;566(Pt 1):21-8. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.083113. Epub 2005 Mar 10. J Physiol. 2005. PMID: 15760940 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kiang NYS, Watanabe T, Thomas EC, Clark LF. Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve. Cambridge, Mass, USA: MIT Press; 1965.
-
- Manwani A, Koch C. Detecting and estimating signals in noisy cable structures, I: neuronal noise sources. Neural Computation. 1999;11(8):1797–1829. - PubMed
-
- White JA, Rubinstein JT, Kay AR. Channel noise in neurons. Trends in Neurosciences. 2000;23(3):131–137. - PubMed
-
- Schneidman E, Freedman B, Segev I. Channel stochasticity may be critical in determining the reliability and precision of spike timing. Neural Computation. 1998;10(7):1679–1703. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources