Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;23(5):508-12.

Measuring new born foot length to identify small babies in need of extra care: a cross-sectional hospital based study

Affiliations

Measuring new born foot length to identify small babies in need of extra care: a cross-sectional hospital based study

Satarupa Mukherjee et al. Iran J Pediatr. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The neonatal mortality rate (NMR) continues to remain quite high, one important cause being preterm deliveries. The main obstacle in the pathway towards decreasing NMR is identification of babies in need of extra care. To analyze the utility of newborn foot length as a proxy measure for birth weight and gestational age.

Methods: A cross-sectional study done in a hospital of eastern India with 351 babies during 4 months. Right foot length of each recorded using a plastic, stiff ruler.

Findings: 48.1% babies were preterm, 51.8% low birth weight (LBW) and 33.3% very low birth weight (VLBW). Foot length less than 7.75 cm has 92.3% sensitivity and 86.3% specificity for identification of preterm neonates. For identification of LBW babies (<2500 gm) a foot length less than 7.85cm has 100% sensitivity and 95.3% specificity. Foot length less than 6.85 cm has 100% sensitivity and 94.9% specifity for identification of VLBW babies (<1500 gm).

Conclusion: Foot length may be used in the identification of LBW and preterm babies who are in need of extra care.

Keywords: Foot Length; Low Birth Weight; Neonatal Mortality; Preterm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sensitivity and specificity values to identify preterm babies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sensitivity and specificity values to identify low birth weight babies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sensitivity and specificity values to identify very low birth weight babies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365(9462):891–900. - PubMed
    1. Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Haws RA, et al. Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: improving service supply and community demand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9(Suppl 1):S7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Darmstadt GL, Lee AC, Cousens S, et al. 60 Million non-facility births: who can deliver in community settings to reduce intrapartum-related deaths? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(Suppl 1):S89–112. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawn JE, Kinney M, Lee AC, et al. Reducing intrapartum-related deaths and disability: can the health system deliver? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(Suppl 1):S123–40. - PubMed
    1. Marchant T, Jaribu J, Penfold S, et al. Measuring newborn foot length to identify small babies in need of extra care: a cross sectional hospital based study with community follow-up in Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:624. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources