Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation
- PMID: 2480218
- DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(89)90029-4
Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation
Abstract
Percutaneous stimulation of human motor cortex electrically (focal anode) and with magnetic coils (MCs) of various designs is compared. The theoretical prediction was confirmed that positioning the standard round MC laterally and orientating it more towards the vertical induces an electric field appropriate for directly exciting corticospinal neurons (cf., the conventional tangential orientation at the vertex). Thus, during voluntary contraction, minimal latency compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) in contralateral arm were elicited both by focal anodic and appropriately orientated MC stimulation. Conduction time from motor cortex to motoneuron was estimated by subtracting peripheral conduction time and monosynaptic delay at the motoneuron from the overall CMAP latency, yielding an estimated corticospinal conduction velocity as high as 66 m/sec. Discontinuous latency variations observed in population CMAPs or individual motor units approximated mono- or polysynaptic cortical synaptic delays and, therefore, are attributed to the intervals between direct and early, or late indirect corticospinal discharges. A TV computer system was used to track movements of individual digits and the hand following MC stimulation. An appropriately orientated MC readily elicited movements predominantly of a single digit, implying focal activation of motor cortex. A double square and a small pointed MC proved especially convenient for eliciting reproducibly single digit movements. Stronger stimulation revealed a topographical gradient in the responses of the different digits. Responses to a given MC stimulus a little above threshold were variable in amplitude, which could not be explained by the relationship of stimulus to phase of the cardiac or respiratory cycle. Overall, our findings indicate the importance of appropriately orientating a standard round MC and using a specially designed MC to obtain the various types of motor response to stimulation of cerebral cortex.
Similar articles
-
Matching focal and non-focal magnetic coil stimulation to properties of human nervous system: mapping motor unit fields in motor cortex contrasted with altering sequential digit movements by premotor-SMA stimulation.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:3-28. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991. PMID: 1773769 Review.
-
A comparison of corticospinal activation by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation of monkey motor cortex.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Sep-Oct;77(5):390-401. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(90)90061-h. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990. PMID: 1697531
-
Paraesthesias are elicited by single pulse, magnetic coil stimulation of motor cortex in susceptible humans.Brain. 1991 Dec;114 ( Pt 6):2505-20. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.6.2505. Brain. 1991. PMID: 1782528
-
Comparison of human transcallosal responses evoked by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Nov-Dec;74(6):417-24. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(89)90030-0. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989. PMID: 2480220
-
[Transcranial cortex stimulation with magnetic field pulses: methodologic and physiologic principles].EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1988 Dec;19(4):209-15. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1988. PMID: 3145181 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Muscle MEPs From Transcranial Magnetic and Electrical Stimulation and Appearance of Reflexes in Horses.Front Neurosci. 2020 Sep 25;14:570372. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.570372. eCollection 2020. Front Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 33122992 Free PMC article.
-
Time-varying coupling of EEG oscillations predicts excitability fluctuations in the primary motor cortex as reflected by motor evoked potentials amplitude: an EEG-TMS study.Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 May;35(5):1969-80. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22306. Epub 2013 Jul 19. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014. PMID: 23868714 Free PMC article.
-
Functional mapping of the sensorimotor cortex: combined use of magnetoencephalography, functional MRI, and motor evoked potentials.Neuroradiology. 1995 Oct;37(7):526-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00593709. Neuroradiology. 1995. PMID: 8570046
-
Age, Height, and Sex on Motor Evoked Potentials: Translational Data From a Large Italian Cohort in a Clinical Environment.Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jun 4;13:185. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00185. eCollection 2019. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31214003 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.Exp Brain Res. 2016 Sep;234(9):2629-42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4667-8. Epub 2016 May 5. Exp Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 27150317
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources