Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;59(10):1577-82.
doi: 10.4187/respcare.03091. Epub 2014 May 6.

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation in subjects with mild COPD

Affiliations

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation in subjects with mild COPD

Cristina Jácome et al. Respir Care. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a core component of the management of patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD. However, as impairments in quadriceps muscle strength and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are already present in patients with mild COPD, there is a need to investigate whether PR could also be beneficial to these patients. Thus, this study assessed the impact of PR on patients with mild COPD.

Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted. Twenty-six participants (67.8 ± 10.3 years old; FEV1 83.8 ± 6.4% of predicted) enrolled in a 12-week PR program with exercise training and psychoeducation. Lung function was assessed by spirometry, dyspnea with the Modified Medical Research Council questionnaire, functional balance with the Timed Up and Go test, muscle strength with 10-repetition maximum testing, exercise tolerance with the 6-min walk test, emotional state with the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, and HRQOL with the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).

Results: Significant effects were observed on participants' dyspnea (P = .003, effect size [ES] = 0.7), functional balance (P < .001, ES = 0.8), shoulder flexor/knee extensor strength (P < .001, ES = 1.2-1.3), and exercise tolerance (P < .001, ES = 0.5). With the exception of the SGRQ impact score, the symptom (P < .001, ES = 0.6), activity (P = .02, ES = 0.4), and total (P = .005, ES = 0.3) scores improved significantly after PR. The PR program had no significant effect on participants' lung function and emotional state.

Conclusions: Patients with mild COPD benefit from PR and could therefore be routinely included in these programs. Studies with more robust designs and with long-term follow-ups are needed to inform guidelines for PR in mild COPD.

Keywords: COPD; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; early medical intervention; pulmonary rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources