Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Feb;9(1):16-21.
doi: 10.1159/000360438.

Monitoring in metastatic breast cancer: is imaging outdated in the era of circulating tumor cells?

Affiliations
Review

Monitoring in metastatic breast cancer: is imaging outdated in the era of circulating tumor cells?

Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni et al. Breast Care (Basel). 2014 Feb.

Abstract

In clinical practice imaging technologies such as computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are well-established methods for monitoring metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients and for assessing therapeutic efficacy. However, several weeks of treatment are required before these technologies can offer any reliable information on effective disease regression, and, in the meanwhile, the patients are exposed to potentially unnecessary therapy. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been shown to be powerful prognostic and predictive markers and provide clinicians with valuable information. However, in one clinical trial, an early change of chemotherapy based on CTC detection did not result in improved survival. Currently, CTC detection outside clinical trials should be limited to selected clinical situations, i.e. increased treatment toxicity or as risk estimation.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Circulating tumor cells; Imaging; MRI; Metastatic breast cancer; Minimal residual disease; PET/CT.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Glendenning J, Cook G. Imaging breast cancer bone metastases: Current status and future directions. Semin Nucl Med. 2013;43:317–323. - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. - PubMed
    1. Sree SV, Ng EY, Acharya RU, Faust O. Breast imaging: A survey. World J Clin Oncol. 2011;2:171–178. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall FM. Transition to digital mammography. Radiology. 2012;262:374. - PubMed
    1. De Abreu FB, Wells WA, Tsongalis GJ. The emerging role of the molecular diagnostics laboratory in breast cancer personalized medicine. Am J Pathol. 2013;183:1075–1083. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources