Monitoring in metastatic breast cancer: is imaging outdated in the era of circulating tumor cells?
- PMID: 24803882
- PMCID: PMC3995372
- DOI: 10.1159/000360438
Monitoring in metastatic breast cancer: is imaging outdated in the era of circulating tumor cells?
Abstract
In clinical practice imaging technologies such as computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are well-established methods for monitoring metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients and for assessing therapeutic efficacy. However, several weeks of treatment are required before these technologies can offer any reliable information on effective disease regression, and, in the meanwhile, the patients are exposed to potentially unnecessary therapy. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been shown to be powerful prognostic and predictive markers and provide clinicians with valuable information. However, in one clinical trial, an early change of chemotherapy based on CTC detection did not result in improved survival. Currently, CTC detection outside clinical trials should be limited to selected clinical situations, i.e. increased treatment toxicity or as risk estimation.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Circulating tumor cells; Imaging; MRI; Metastatic breast cancer; Minimal residual disease; PET/CT.
References
-
- Glendenning J, Cook G. Imaging breast cancer bone metastases: Current status and future directions. Semin Nucl Med. 2013;43:317–323. - PubMed
-
- Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. - PubMed
-
- Hall FM. Transition to digital mammography. Radiology. 2012;262:374. - PubMed
-
- De Abreu FB, Wells WA, Tsongalis GJ. The emerging role of the molecular diagnostics laboratory in breast cancer personalized medicine. Am J Pathol. 2013;183:1075–1083. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
