Comment on

• In defense of P values.

  Murtaugh PA. Murtaugh PA. Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):611-7. doi: 10.1890/13-0590.1. Ecology. 2014. PMID: 24804441 Review.
• The common sense of P values.

  de Valpine P. de Valpine P. Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):617-21. doi: 10.1890/13-1271.1. Ecology. 2014. PMID: 24804442 No abstract available.
• To P or not to P?

  Barber JJ, Ogle K. Barber JJ, et al. Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):621-6. doi: 10.1890/13-1402.1. Ecology. 2014. PMID: 24804443 No abstract available.
• P values are only an index to evidence: 20th- vs. 21st-century statistical science.

  Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Burnham KP, et al. Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):627-30. doi: 10.1890/13-1066.1. Ecology. 2014. PMID: 24804444
• Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC.

  Aho K, Derryberry D, Peterson T. Aho K, et al. Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):631-6. doi: 10.1890/13-1452.1. Ecology. 2014. PMID: 24804445 No abstract available.
• In defense of P values: comment on the statistical methods actually used by ecologists.

  Stanton-Geddes J, de Freitas CG, Dambros Cde S. Stanton-Geddes J, et al. Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):637-42. doi: 10.1890/13-1156.1. Ecology. 2014. PMID: 24804446 No abstract available.
• Comment on Murtaugh.

  Lavine M. Lavine M. Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):642-5. doi: 10.1890/13-1112.1. Ecology. 2014. PMID: 24804447
• Recurring controversies about P values and confidence intervals revisited.

  Spanos A. Spanos A. Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):645-51. doi: 10.1890/13-1291.1. Ecology. 2014. PMID: 24804448