Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 7;9(5):e96751.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096751. eCollection 2014.

Correlation of standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient in integrated whole-body PET/MRI of primary and recurrent cervical cancer

Affiliations

Correlation of standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient in integrated whole-body PET/MRI of primary and recurrent cervical cancer

Johannes Grueneisen et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: To evaluate a potential correlation of the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) in primary and recurrent cervical cancer based on integrated PET/MRI examinations.

Methods: 19 consecutive patients (mean age 51.6 years; range 30-72 years) with histopathologically confirmed primary cervical cancer (n = 9) or suspected tumor recurrence (n = 10) were prospectively enrolled for an integrated PET/MRI examination. Two radiologists performed a consensus reading in random order, using a dedicated post-processing software. Polygonal regions of interest (ROI) covering the entire tumor lesions were drawn into PET/MR images to assess SUVmax and into ADC parameter maps to determine ADCmin values. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to assess a potential correlation between the mean values of ADCmin and SUVmax.

Results: In 15 out of 19 patients cervical cancer lesions (n = 12) or lymph node metastases (n = 42) were detected. Mean SUVmax (12.5 ± 6.5) and ADCmin (644.5 ± 179.7 × 10(-5) mm2/s) values for all assessed tumor lesions showed a significant but weak inverse correlation (R = -0.342, p < 0.05). When subdivided in primary and recurrent tumors, primary tumors and associated primary lymph node metastases revealed a significant and strong inverse correlation between SUVmax and ADCmin (R = -0.692, p < 0.001), whereas recurrent cancer lesions did not show a significant correlation.

Conclusions: These initial results of this emerging hybrid imaging technique demonstrate the high diagnostic potential of simultaneous PET/MR imaging for the assessment of functional biomarkers, revealing a significant and strong correlation of tumor metabolism and higher cellularity in cervical cancer lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure a shows a T1w 3D VIBE image of an inhomogeneously contrast-enhancing mass lesion of the cervix of a 49-year-old patient.
Corresponding PET (b) and fused PET/MRI images (c) demonstrate elevated FDG-uptake. The lesion shows corresponding diffusion impairment in DWI (d1, b = 1000) and low signal intensity in the ADC map (zoom image d2).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scatter plot demonstrating a significant inverse correlation between the ADCmin and the SUVmax for primary cervical cancer lesions and associated lymph node metastases.
(n = 21; R = −0.692; p<0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Scatter plot showing a significant inverse correlation between the ADCmin and the SUVmax for primary and recurrent cervical cancer lesions.
(n = 12; R = −0.628; p<0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4. T1 weighted post-contrast sagittal 3D VIBE (a) and fused PET/MRI image (b) of an inhomogeneously contrast-enhancing and FDG avid cervical cancer lesion.
Image c and d show corresponding tracer uptake in PET (c) and restricted diffusion in DWI (d1) with low signal intensity on the corresponding ADC map (d2).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F (2011) Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, et al. (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58: 71–96. - PubMed
    1. Bipat S, Glas AS, van der Velden J, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2003) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 91: 59–66. - PubMed
    1. Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, et al. (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol 15: 71–78. - PubMed
    1. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD (2012) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 263: 19–32. - PubMed

Substances