Measurement of health-related and oral health-related quality of life among individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 24805870
- DOI: 10.1597/13-104
Measurement of health-related and oral health-related quality of life among individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective : To compare health-related quality of life and oral health-related quality of life between nonsyndromic individuals with and without cleft lip and/or cleft palate and to identify the most affected quality of life dimensions in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. Design : Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Of the 314 identified citations, 23 articles were submitted to quality assessment. Data from nine studies on health-related quality of life and six on oral health-related quality of life were extracted for meta-analysis. Main Outcome Measures : Pooled mean differences of health-related quality of life between adults with and without cleft lip and/or palate, pooled means of health-related quality of life dimensions of children and adults with cleft lip and/or palate and oral health-related quality of life dimensions of children and adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate with a 95% confidence interval were calculated. Results : Quality assessment revealed methodological differences between studies. Lack of subgroup stratification and absence of control for confounders were the main limitations. Heterogeneity was detected on the comparison of oral health-related quality of life and health-related quality of life between children with and without cleft lip and/or palate, and oral health-related quality of life between adolescents with and without cleft lip and/or palate. A random-effect model showed a significant difference on health-related quality of life between adults with and without cleft lip and/or palate (mean difference = 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.05). Psychological health (mean, 78.9; 95% confidence interval, 70.1 to 87.7) and vitality (mean, 68.1; 95% confidence interval, 48.0 to 88.1) were the most affected health-related quality of life dimensions in children and adults with cleft lip and/or palate, respectively. Means of health-related quality of life dimensions in children and adults with cleft lip and/or palate and oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate varied yet did not differ in indirect comparisons. Conclusion : The presence of cleft lip and/or palate negatively affected the health-related quality of life of adults, mainly on psychosocial dimensions.
Keywords: cleft lip; cleft palate; meta-analysis; quality of life.
Similar articles
-
Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;2011(2):CD003315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003315.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21328261 Free PMC article.
-
Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD003315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003315.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD003315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003315.pub3. PMID: 15266479 Updated.
-
Prevalence of dental anomalies in nonsyndromic individuals with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Mar;49(2):194-200. doi: 10.1597/10-043. Epub 2011 Jul 8. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012. PMID: 21740173
-
Parental consanguinity and nonsyndromic orofacial clefts in children: a systematic review and meta-analyses.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Sep;51(5):501-13. doi: 10.1597/12-209. Epub 2013 May 2. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014. PMID: 23638915
-
Speech and language therapy interventions for children with cleft palate: a systematic review.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013 Jan;50(1):e1-e17. doi: 10.1597/11-202. Epub 2012 Mar 20. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013. PMID: 22433039
Cited by
-
Incidence of non-syndromic orofacial cleft during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia.BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):2538. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17270-7. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38114928 Free PMC article.
-
Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life among Non-Syndromic School-Age Children with Orofacial Clefts: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in Northern Italy.Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 21;9(7):1098. doi: 10.3390/children9071098. Children (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35884082 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence Mapping and Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews on Various Aspects Related to Cleft Lip and Palate.J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 16;12(18):6002. doi: 10.3390/jcm12186002. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37762942 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oral health-related quality of life among young adults with cleft in northern Finland.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Jun;6(3):305-310. doi: 10.1002/cre2.284. Epub 2020 May 12. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020. PMID: 32396275 Free PMC article.
-
"I smile, but Without Showing My Teeth": The Lived Experience of Cleft, Lip, and Palate in Adults.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Jul;57(7):799-807. doi: 10.1177/1055665620922096. Epub 2020 Apr 30. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020. PMID: 32351124 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical