Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults
- PMID: 24806481
- PMCID: PMC4012950
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096315
Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults
Abstract
Introduction: Graphic warnings (GWs) on cigarette packs are widely used internationally and perhaps will be in the US but their impact is not well understood. This study tested support for competing hypotheses in different subgroups of young adults defined by their history of cigarette smoking and individual difference variables (e.g., psychological reactance). One hypothesis predicted adaptive responding (GWs would lower smoking-related intentions) and another predicted defensive responding (GWs would raise smoking-related intentions).
Methods: Participants were an online sample of 1,169 Americans ages 18-24, who were randomly assigned either to view nine GWs designed by the FDA or to a no-label control. Both the intention to smoke in the future and the intention to quit smoking (among smokers) were assessed before and after message exposure.
Results: GWs lowered intention to smoke in the future among those with a moderate lifetime smoking history (between 1 and 100 cigarettes), and they increased intention to quit smoking among those with a heavy lifetime smoking history (more than 100 cigarettes). Both effects were limited to individuals who had smoked in some but not all of the prior 30 days (i.e., occasional smokers). No evidence of defensive "boomerang effects" on intention was observed in any subgroup.
Conclusion: Graphic warnings can reduce interest in smoking among occasional smokers, a finding that supports the adaptive-change hypothesis. GWs that target occasional smokers might be more effective at reducing cigarette smoking in young adults.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Graphic cigarette pack warnings do not produce more negative implicit evaluations of smoking compared to text-only warnings.PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194627. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29543890 Free PMC article.
-
Cigarette Graphic Warning Labels Are Not Created Equal: They Can Increase or Decrease Smokers' Quit Intentions Relative to Text-Only Warnings.Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1155-1162. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw389. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017. PMID: 28031378 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Graphic Warning Labels Elicit Affective and Thoughtful Responses from Smokers: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.PLoS One. 2015 Dec 16;10(12):e0142879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142879. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26672982 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):905-12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2621. JAMA Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27273839 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Perceptions and perceived impact of graphic cigarette health warning labels on smoking behavior among U.S. young adults.Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Apr;16(4):469-77. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt176. Epub 2013 Nov 8. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014. PMID: 24212476 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Influences of Self-Efficacy, Response Efficacy, and Reactance on Responses to Cigarette Health Warnings: A Longitudinal Study of Adult Smokers in Australia and Canada.Health Commun. 2016 Dec;31(12):1517-26. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1089456. Epub 2016 May 2. Health Commun. 2016. PMID: 27135826 Free PMC article.
-
Does Reactance against Cigarette Warning Labels Matter? Warning Label Responses and Downstream Smoking Cessation amongst Adult Smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United States.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159245. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27411100 Free PMC article.
-
Why smokers avoid cigarette pack risk messages: Two randomized clinical trials in the United States.Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;213:165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.049. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Soc Sci Med. 2018. PMID: 30096636 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Graphic cigarette pack warnings do not produce more negative implicit evaluations of smoking compared to text-only warnings.PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194627. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29543890 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Pictorial Health Warnings on Cognitive, Affective, and Smoking Behavior: A Mixed Methods Study in Four Cities in Indonesia.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):397-405. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.2.397. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021. PMID: 33639653 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andrews CL (2012) Graphic tobacco warning case can present SCOTUS opportunity on commercial speech doctrine.
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2012) Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: A report of the surgeon general. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical