Mifepristone and oral, vaginal, or sublingual misoprostol for second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 24807339
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000290
Mifepristone and oral, vaginal, or sublingual misoprostol for second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of the vaginal and sublingual administration of the synthetic prostaglandin misoprostol with the currently used oral administration route in second-trimester medical abortion.
Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial of medical abortion with misoprostol after mifepristone priming at 14-24 weeks of gestation. From 2009 to 2013, recruited women received 200 mg mifepristone orally followed 24-48 hours later by an 800-microgram vaginal loading dose of misoprostol. Women were then randomized to receive additional 400-microgram misoprostol doses orally every 3 hours, vaginally every 4 hours, or sublingually every 3 hours. The main outcome was the duration of abortion with emphasis on the proportion of women undelivered 12 hours after the misoprostol loading dose in the three groups.
Results: A total of 302 women were randomized: 100 to oral, 100 to vaginal, and 102 to sublingual misoprostol. The median gestation at recruitment was oral 19.1 weeks (interquartile range 17.2-20.8), vaginal 19.4 weeks (interquartile range 17.3-20.4), and sublingual 19.7 weeks (interquartile range 17.6-21.0). The overall abortion duration was longer in women receiving oral misoprostol: oral 9.5 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5-11.4), vaginal 7.4 hours (95% CI 6.5-8.2), and sublingual 7.8 hours (95% CI 7.0-9.2). Overall, 84 of 302 (27.8%) women were undelivered at 12 hours, comprising 37.0% (95% CI 28.7-47.8) oral, 20.5% (95% CI 14.0-30.1) vaginal, and 21.0% (95% CI 14.3-30.7) sublingual groups.
Conclusion: Vaginal or sublingual misoprostol administered after a vaginal loading dose in second-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone priming is associated with a shorter time to pregnancy termination compared with an oral regimen.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00864799.
Level of evidence: I.
Comment in
-
When pregnancy must end in the second trimester.Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1153-1154. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000318. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24807344 No abstract available.
References
-
- Ashok PW, Templeton A, Wagaarachchi PT, Flett GM. Midtrimester medical termination of pregnancy: a review of 1002 consecutive cases. Contraception 2004;69:51–8.
-
- Kapp N, Borgatta L, Stubblefield PG, Vragovic O, Moreno N. Mifepristone in midtrimester medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1304–10.
-
- Danielsson-Gemzell K, Lalitkumar S. Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone–misoprostol and misoprostol alone: a review of methods and management. Reprod Health Matters 2008;16(suppl):162–72.
-
- Dickinson JE, Brownell P, McGinnis K, Nathan E. Mifepristone and second trimester pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality in Western Australia: worth the effort. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;50:60–4.
-
- Ngoc NT, Shochet T, Raghavan S, Blum J, Nga NT, Minh NT, et al.. Mifepristone and misoprostol compared with misoprostol alone for second-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:601–8.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
