Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):360-3.
doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.13458.

Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience

Affiliations

Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience

Sedat Alibek et al. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Acoustic noise during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the main source for patient discomfort and leads to verbal communication problems, difficulties in sedation, and hearing impairment. Silent Scan technology uses less changes in gradient excitation levels, which is directly related to noise levels. Here, we report our preliminary experience with this technique in neuroimaging with regard to subjective and objective noise levels and image quality.

Materials and methods: Ten patients underwent routine brain MRI with 3 Tesla MR750w system and 12-channel head coil. T1-weighted gradient echo (BRAVO) and Silenz pulse sequence (TE=0, 3D radial center-out k-space filling and data sampling with relatively small gradient steps) were performed. Patients rated subjective sound impression for both sequences on a 6-point scale. Objective sound level measurements were performed with a dedicated device in gantry at different operation modes. Image quality was subjectively assessed in consensus by two radiologists on a 3-point scale.

Results: Readers rated image quality as fully diagnostic in all patients. Measured mean noise was reduced significantly with Silenz sequence (68.8 dB vs. 104.65 dB with BRAVO, P = 0.024) corresponding to 34.3% reduction in sound intensity and 99,97% reduction in sound pressure. No significant difference was observed between Silenz sound levels and ambient sounds (i.e., background noise in the scanner room, 68.8 dB vs. 68.73 dB, P = 0.5). The patients' subjective sound level score was lower for Silenz compared with conventional sequence (1.1 vs. 2.3, P = 0.003).

Conclusion: T1-weighted Silent Scan is a promising technique for acoustic noise reduction and improved patient comfort.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Silenz acquisition and k-space readout scheme. Silenz uses a 3D radial center-out data acquisition scheme between radio frequency pulses (RF), stepping through k-space by increasing gradients in small steps. Ramp-up and ramp-down of gradients (Gx, Gy, Gz) between spokes are eliminated, resulting in the silent properties of the pulse sequence.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The sound level meter is placed in the gantry at a position corresponding to the right ear of the patient.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Silenz vs. BRAVO image. Contrast enhanced sample image from a 3D T1-weighted Silenz scan (left) and 3D BRAVO scan (right) are shown (screenshots from a transverse reconstruction of 3D source images).

References

    1. McJury M, Shellock FG. Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:37–45. - PubMed
    1. Moelker A, Maas RAJ, Pattynama PMT. Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding. Radiology. 2004;232:107–113. - PubMed
    1. Ogurlu M, Orhan ME, Cinar S, et al. Effect of headphones on sevoflurane requirement for MRI. Pediatr Radiology. 2012;42:1432–1436. - PubMed
    1. Brummett RE, Talbot JM, Charuhas P. Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;169:539–540. - PubMed
    1. Madio DP, Lowe IJ. Ultra-fast imaging using low flip angles and FIDs. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34:525–529. - PubMed