Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr 28;5(2):e0016.
doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10150. eCollection 2014 Apr.

Assessment of margins in transoral laser and robotic surgery

Affiliations

Assessment of margins in transoral laser and robotic surgery

Yaniv Hamzany et al. Rambam Maimonides Med J. .

Abstract

The growing practice of endoscopic surgery has changed the therapeutic management of selected head and neck cancers. Although a negative surgical margin in resection of neoplasm is the most important surgical principle in oncologic surgery, controversies exist regarding assessment and interpretation of the status of margin resection. The aim of this review was to summarize the literature considering the assessment and feasibility of negative margins in transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Free margin status is being approached differently in vocal cord cancer (1-2 mm) compared with other sites in the upper aerodigestive tract (2-5 mm). Exposure, orientation of the pathological specimen, and co-operation with the pathologist are crucial principles needed to be followed in transoral surgery. Piecemeal resection to better expose deep tumor involvement and biopsies taken from surgical margins surrounding site of resection can improve margin assessment. High rates of negative surgical margins can be achieved with TLM and TORS. Adjuvant treatment decision should take into consideration also the surgeon's judgment with regard to the completeness of tumor resection.

Keywords: Cancer; glottis; laser; margin; robot; transoral.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jesse RH, Sugarbaker EV. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: why we fail. Am J Surg. 1976;132:435–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(76)90314-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strong MS. Laser excision of carcinoma of the larynx. Laryngoscope. 1975;85:1286–9. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197508000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambrosch P. The role of laser microsurgery in the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;15:82–8. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3280147336. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoffman HT, Buatti J. Update on the endoscopic management of laryngeal cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12:525–31. - PubMed
    1. Silver CE, Beitler JJ, Shaha AR, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Current trends in initial management of laryngeal cancer: the declining use of open surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266:1333–52. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1028-2. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources