A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives
- PMID: 24812309
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu089
A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives
Abstract
Study question: Does intensive counselling before insertion and throughout the first year of use have any influence on discontinuation rates due to unpredictable menstrual bleeding in users of three long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs)?
Summary answer: Intensive counselling had a similar effect to routine counselling in terms of discontinuation rates due to unpredictable menstrual bleeding in new users of the contraceptives.
What is known already: Contraceptive efficacy and satisfaction rates are very high with LARCs, including the etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing implant, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and the TCu380A intrauterine device (IUD). However, unpredictable menstrual bleeding constitutes the principal reason for premature discontinuation, particularly in the cases of the ENG-implant and the LNG-IUS.
Study design, size, duration: A randomized clinical trial was conducted between 2011 and 2013, and involved 297 women: 98 ENG-implant users, 99 LNG-IUS users and 100 TCu380A IUD users.
Participants, setting, methods: Women accepting each contraceptive method were randomized into two groups after the women chose their contraceptive method. Group I received routine counselling at the clinic, including information on safety, efficacy and side effects, as well as what to expect regarding bleeding disturbances. Group II received 'intensive counselling'. In addition to the information provided to those in Group I, these women also received leaflets on their chosen method and were seen by the same three professionals, the most experienced at the clinic, throughout the year of follow-up. These three professionals went over all the information provided at each consultation. Women in both groups were instructed to return to the clinic after 45 (±7) days and at 6 and 12 (±1) months after insertion. They were instructed to record all bleeding episodes on a menstrual calendar specifically provided for this purpose. Additionally, satisfaction with the method was evaluated by a questionnaire completed by the women after 12 months of use of the contraceptive method.
Main results and the role of chance: There were no significant differences between the intensive and routine counselling groups on the discontinuation rates due to unpredictable menstrual bleeding of the three contraceptives under evaluation. The 1-year cumulative discontinuation rates due to menstrual bleeding irregularities were 2.1, 2.7 and 4.0% and the continuation rates were 82.6, 81.0 and 73.2%, for the ENG-implant, the LNG-IUS or the TCu380A IUD users, respectively. The main reasons for discontinuation of the methods were weight gain in users of the ENG-implant and expulsion of the TCu380A.
Limitations, reasons for caution: The main limitations are that we cannot assure generalization of the results to another settings and that the routine counselling provided by our counsellors may already be appropriate for the women attending the clinic and so consequently intensive counselling including written leaflets was unable to influence the premature discontinuation rate due to unpredictable menstrual bleeding. Additionally, counselling could discourage some women from using the LARC methods offered in the study and consequently those women may have decided on other contraceptives.
Wider implications of the findings: Routine counselling may be sufficient for many women to help reduce premature discontinuation rates and improve continuation rates and user satisfaction among new users of LARC methods.
Trial registration number: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01392157).
Study funding/competing interest(s): The study was partially funded by the Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) grant # 2012/01379-0, the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) grant #573747/2008-3 and by Merck (MSD), Brazil under an unrestricted grant. The LNG-IUS were donated by the International Contraceptive Access Foundation (ICA) and the copper IUD by Injeflex, São Paulo, Brazil. L.B. has occasionally served on the Board of MSD, Bayer and Vifor.
Similar articles
-
Estimated disability-adjusted life years averted by long-term provision of long acting contraceptive methods in a Brazilian clinic.Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2163-70. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu191. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 25085802
-
Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.Hum Reprod. 2015 Jul;30(7):1580-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev102. Epub 2015 May 19. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25990577
-
A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls.Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2527-38. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev221. Epub 2015 Sep 25. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 26409014 Clinical Trial.
-
Levonorgestrel-releasing IUD as a method of contraception with therapeutic properties.Contraception. 1995 Nov;52(5):269-76. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00210-2. Contraception. 1995. PMID: 8585882 Review.
-
A risk-benefit assessment of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.Drug Saf. 1996 Dec;15(6):430-40. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615060-00006. Drug Saf. 1996. PMID: 8968696 Review.
Cited by
-
Levonorgestrel intrauterine system associated amenorrhea: a systematic review and metaanalysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;220(5):440-448.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30527945 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Jun 8;14(6):548. doi: 10.3390/ph14060548. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34201123 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: what works and what doesn't?BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Oct;46(4):254-269. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200377. Epub 2019 Dec 11. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 31826883 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability and continuation of use of the subdermal contraceptive implant among adolescents and young women in Argentina: a retrospective cohort study.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2189507. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2189507. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023. PMID: 37042700 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 23;4(4):CD004317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004317.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31013349 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous