Treatment patterns with topicals, traditional systemics and biologics in psoriasis - a Swedish database analysis
- PMID: 24813476
- DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12494
Treatment patterns with topicals, traditional systemics and biologics in psoriasis - a Swedish database analysis
Abstract
Background: Little data exist on real-world treatment patterns in psoriasis, especially from European settings.
Objective: To estimate, for topicals, systemics and biologics, the time to non-persistency, switching, augmentation and insufficient treatment result (only for biologics), as well as to estimate the time to restart, in patients treated with each treatment class in Sweden based on registry data.
Methods: This database analysis utilized data from patients with psoriasis from several Swedish administrative registers. Patients were identified through combinations of diagnoses from two regional registers and filled prescriptions for relevant treatments from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event ('survival') functions were estimated with relevant treatment events as failure and the proportions of patients having experienced an event at specific time-points were derived from the failure rates.
Results: For topicals, systemics and biologics the number of indexed treatment episodes were 25,396, 2963, and 628 respectively. One year after treatment initiation, the proportion of patients who were classed as non-persistent with topicals, systemics and biologics were estimated at 88.3%, 47.9% and 43.2% respectively. Among patients who remained persistent, within 1 year of treatment start the proportions of treatment episodes in which patients were augmented were estimated at 56.0% for topicals, 45.3% for systemics and 58.9% for biologics. In addition, within 1 year of non-persistence, 49.0% of topicals, 60.8% of systemics and 80.2% of biologics treatment episodes were re-initiated, with 35.4-52.5% re-initiated on the non-persistent treatment depending on treatment class. In addition, among patients on biologics, 29.2% of treatment episodes had an insufficient treatment result within 1 year of treatment start.
Conclusion: Persistency to psoriasis treatments may be sub-optimal and patients who remain persistent relatively frequently receive augmentation therapy or switch to another therapy. Therefore, current treatment options in psoriasis may be insufficient.
© 2014 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
References
-
- Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58: 826-850.
-
- Barzi S, Befrits G, Bergman B et al.. Läkemedelsbehandling av psoriasis - ny rekommendation. Information from the Medical Products Agency, 2011.
-
- Baer AH, Khanna V, Feldman SR. Literature is lacking in discussion of non-adherence in dermatology. J Dermatolog Treat 2010; 21: 109-110.
-
- Chastek B, Fox KM, Watson C, Kricorian G, Gandra SR. Psoriasis treatment patterns with etanercept and adalimumab in a United States health plan population. J Dermatolog Treat 2013; 24: 25-33.
-
- Bonafede M, Fox KM, Watson C, Princic N, Gandra SR. Treatment patterns in the first year after initiating tumor necrosis factor blockers in real-world settings. Adv Ther 2012; 29: 664-674.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical