Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 5;94(6):818-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 8.

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between

Collaborators, Affiliations

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between

Gail P Jarvik et al. Am J Hum Genet. .

Abstract

As more research studies incorporate next-generation sequencing (including whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing), investigators and institutional review boards face difficult questions regarding which genomic results to return to research participants and how. An American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2013 policy paper suggesting that pathogenic mutations in 56 specified genes should be returned in the clinical setting has raised the question of whether comparable recommendations should be considered in research settings. The Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium and the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network are multisite research programs that aim to develop practical strategies for addressing questions concerning the return of results in genomic research. CSER and eMERGE committees have identified areas of consensus regarding the return of genomic results to research participants. In most circumstances, if results meet an actionability threshold for return and the research participant has consented to return, genomic results, along with referral for appropriate clinical follow-up, should be offered to participants. However, participants have a right to decline the receipt of genomic results, even when doing so might be viewed as a threat to the participants' health. Research investigators should be prepared to return research results and incidental findings discovered in the course of their research and meeting an actionability threshold, but they have no ethical obligation to actively search for such results. These positions are consistent with the recognition that clinical research is distinct from medical care in both its aims and its guiding moral principles.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Green R.C., Berg J.S., Grody W.W., Kalia S.S., Korf B.R., Martin C.L., McGuire A.L., Nussbaum R.L., O’Daniel J.M., Ormond K.E. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet. Med. 2013;15:565–574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification. Genet. Med. 2013;15:664–666. - PubMed
    1. Biesecker B.B., Boehnke M., Calzone K., Markel D.S., Garber J.E., Collins F.S., Weber B.L. Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. JAMA. 1993;269:1970–1974. - PubMed
    1. Bookman E.B., Langehorne A.A., Eckfeldt J.H., Glass K.C., Jarvik G.P., Klag M., Koski G., Motulsky A., Wilfond B., Manolio T.A., NHLBI Working Group Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2006;140:1033–1040. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fabsitz R.R., McGuire A., Sharp R.R., Puggal M., Beskow L.M., Biesecker L.G., Bookman E., Burke W., Burchard E.G., Church G., National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3:574–580. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types