Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;55(1):58-69.
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu037. Epub 2014 May 9.

Successful aging and its discontents: a systematic review of the social gerontology literature

Marty Martinson  1 , Clara Berridge  2
Affiliations

Successful aging and its discontents: a systematic review of the social gerontology literature

Marty Martinson et al. Gerontologist. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to analyze the range of critiques of successful aging models and the suggestions for improvement as expressed in the social gerontology literature.

Design and methods: We conducted a systematic literature review using the following criteria: journal articles retrieved in the Abstracts in Social Gerontology, published 1987-2013, successful aging/ageing in the title or text (n = 453), a critique of successful aging models as a key component of the article. Sixty-seven articles met the criteria. Qualitative methods were used to identify key themes and inductively configure meanings across the range of critiques.

Results: The critiques and remedies fell into 4 categories. The Add and Stir group suggested a multidimensional expansion of successful aging criteria and offered an array of additions. The Missing Voices group advocated for adding older adults' subjective meanings of successful aging to established objective measures. The Hard Hitting Critiques group called for more just and inclusive frameworks that embrace diversity, avoid stigma and discrimination, and intervene at structural contexts of aging. The New Frames and Names group presented alternative ideal models often grounded in Eastern philosophies.

Implications: The vast array of criteria that gerontologists collectively offered to expand Rowe and Kahn's original successful model is symptomatic of the problem that a normative model is by definition exclusionary. Greater reflexivity about gerontology's use of "successful aging" and other normative models is needed.

Keywords: Critical gerontology; Social gerontology; Successful aging.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alley D. E., Putney N. M., Rice M., Bengtson V. L. (2010). The increasing use of theory in social gerontology: 1990–2004. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65, 583–590. 10.1093/geronb/gbq053 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angus J., Reeve P. (2006). Ageism: A threat to “aging well” in the 21st century. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 25, 137–152. 10.1177/0733464805285745
    1. Baltes P. B., Baltes M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In Baltes P. B., Baltes M. M. (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665684.003
    1. Belgrave L. L., Sayed B. A. (2013). Successful/productive aging, responsibility, and reflection. In Arxer S. L., Murphy J. W. (Eds.), The symbolism of globalization, development, and aging (pp. 91–107). New York: Springer Science+Business Media. 10.1007/978-1-4614-4508-1_8
    1. Bowling A., Iliffe S. (2006). Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing. Age and Ageing, 35, 607–614. 10.1093/ageing/afl100 - PubMed

Publication types