Five-year clinical results for treatment of intrabony defects with EMD, guided tissue regeneration and open-flap debridement: a case series
- PMID: 24815103
- DOI: 10.1111/jre.12188
Five-year clinical results for treatment of intrabony defects with EMD, guided tissue regeneration and open-flap debridement: a case series
Abstract
Background and objective: Although regenerative periodontal surgery with EMD or guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has been shown to enhance periodontal regeneration, there are limited data on the long-term results following these treatment modalities. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes in intrabony defects following regenerative periodontal surgery with EMD or GTR compared with open-flap debridement (OFD).
Material and methods: Data from 40 subjects (44 teeth), with no history of smoking or systemic diseases that could interfere with periodontal disease and who received one of three surgical procedures (EMD, GTR or OFD) for two- or three-wall intrabony defects, were analyzed. Postoperative reduction in probing pocket depth, gain in clinical attachment level, gingival recession and percentage bone fill were compared at 1, 3 and 5 years.
Results: Reduction in probing pocket depth after GTR was significantly higher than after OFD at 1 and 3 years postoperatively, but there was no difference between the groups at 5 years. The gains in clinical attachment level for EMD (at 3 and 5 years) and for GTR (at 1, 3 and 5 years) were significantly greater than for OFD. Gingival recession after treatment with EMD and GTR showed a tendency toward positive results, whereas no such tendency was observed for OFD. Postoperative percentage bone fill for EMD and GTR was significantly greater than for OFD at 3 and 5 years.
Conclusions: This is a retrospective study and an exploratory report with a high risk of bias. Within the limits of the current study, it may be concluded that superior gains in clinical attachment level and improved percentage bone fill can be obtained with EMD and GTR when compared with OFD, and these can be maintained over a period of 5 years.
Keywords: enamel matrix protein; guided tissue regeneration; intrabony defect; long-term care.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of intrabony defects using guided tissue regeneration or enamel matrix derivative: a 3-year prospective randomized clinical study.J Periodontol. 2008 Dec;79(12):2281-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.080135. J Periodontol. 2008. PMID: 19053918 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical outcomes after treatment of non-contained intrabony defects with enamel matrix derivative or guided tissue regeneration: a 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial.J Periodontol. 2011 Jan;82(1):62-71. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100144. Epub 2010 Sep 1. J Periodontol. 2011. PMID: 20809859 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparative study utilizing open flap debridement with and without enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a 12-month re-entry study.J Periodontol. 2001 Jan;72(1):25-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.1.25. J Periodontol. 2001. PMID: 11210070 Clinical Trial.
-
The use of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal defects: a literature review and meta-analysis.Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004 Nov 1;15(6):382-402. doi: 10.1177/154411130401500605. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004. PMID: 15574680 Review.
-
Predictability of clinical outcomes following regenerative therapy in intrabony defects.J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):387-93. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.060521. J Periodontol. 2008. PMID: 18315419 Review.
Cited by
-
Nanoscale β-TCP-Laden GelMA/PCL Composite Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023 Jul 12;15(27):32121-32135. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c03059. Epub 2023 Jun 26. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023. PMID: 37364054 Free PMC article.
-
Thermal annealed silk fibroin membranes for periodontal guided tissue regeneration.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019 Feb 12;30(2):27. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6225-y. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019. PMID: 30747338
-
Bony Defect Regeneration in Periodontitis: A Systematic Review of the Literature Regarding the Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative Proteins.Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;13(3):92. doi: 10.3390/dj13030092. Dent J (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40136720 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The efficiency of the regeneration of periodontal intrabony defects in East Asians: A systematic review and pooled analysis.J Dent Sci. 2023 Jan;18(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.10.031. Epub 2022 Nov 11. J Dent Sci. 2023. PMID: 36643225 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow-up of 10 years.J Periodontol. 2022 Apr;93(4):548-559. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0347. Epub 2021 Sep 8. J Periodontol. 2022. PMID: 34258767 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources