Efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic control and glucose variability in type 1 diabetic patients treated with either insulin pumps or multiple insulin injection therapy: a randomized controlled crossover trial
- PMID: 24816997
- DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2557
Efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic control and glucose variability in type 1 diabetic patients treated with either insulin pumps or multiple insulin injection therapy: a randomized controlled crossover trial
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in T1D patients treated with insulin pump therapy or multiple daily insulin therapy.
Methods: Twenty adult patients (ten insulin pump therapy and ten multiple daily insulin) with poor glycaemic control (HbA1c > 8.0%) were randomized into two groups for 6 months: the continuous glucose monitoring arm (using real-time continuous glucose monitoring) and the SMBG arm. After 2 months of wash-out, the participants crossed over. The primary outcome was HbA1c reduction. The secondary outcomes were hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia risk assessment (area under the curve < 70 mg/dL/day and AUC > 200 mg/dL/day, respectively) and glucose variability.
Results: Fourteen patients (eight multiple daily insulin, six insulin pump therapy) used continuous glucose monitoring appropriately (at least 40% of the time). In these patients, the improvement in glycaemic control was more evident during the real-time continuous glucose monitoring period (7.76% ± 0.4 vs 8.54% ± 0.4, p < 0.05) than during the self-monitoring of blood glucose period (8.42% ± 0.4 vs 8.56% ± 0.5, p = 0.2). Better results with continuous glucose monitoring were observed in patients using multiple daily insulin with greater improvement in both glycaemic control (7.71% ± 0.2 vs 8.58% ± 0.2, p < 0.05) and glucose variability and with a marked reduction in the risk of both hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia.
Conclusions: Appropriate use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring improved glycometabolic control in T1D patients. The effects of continuous glucose monitoring were more evident in patients under multiple daily insulin treatment, compared with insulin pump therapy. Glucose variability, in addition to glycaemic control, was improved in compliant diabetic patients.
Keywords: CSII; SMBG; T1D; glucose variability; real-time CGM.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Diabetes technology and treatments in the paediatric age group.Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011 Feb;(170):76-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02582.x. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011. PMID: 21323816 Review.
-
Effect of initiating use of an insulin pump in adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily insulin injections and continuous glucose monitoring (DIAMOND): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Sep;5(9):700-708. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30217-6. Epub 2017 Jul 12. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017. PMID: 28711468 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-reported outcomes for an integrated real-time continuous glucose monitoring/insulin pump system.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Jan;11(1):57-62. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0002. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009. PMID: 19132857 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of flash glucose monitoring with real time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;152:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 May 21. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019. PMID: 31121275 Clinical Trial.
-
Closed loop insulin delivery in diabetes.Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Jun;29(3):315-25. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 10. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015. PMID: 26051293 Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Baseline User Characteristics on the Benefits of Real-Time Versus Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Moderator Analyses of the ALERTT1 Trial.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May;18(3):660-666. doi: 10.1177/19322968221128315. Epub 2022 Sep 29. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024. PMID: 36172693 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Different Glucose Monitoring Methods on Bold Glucose Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 18;2022:2851572. doi: 10.1155/2022/2851572. eCollection 2022. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022. PMID: 35761839 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Cost-Utility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of the Methods and Quality of Studies Using Decision Models or Empirical Data.Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Sep;42(9):929-953. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01388-6. Epub 2024 Jun 21. Pharmacoeconomics. 2024. PMID: 38904911 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Insulin Injection Technique Among Diabetic Patients in Makkah Region in Saudi Arabia.Cureus. 2020 Sep 27;12(9):e10679. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10679. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 33133845 Free PMC article.
-
Smart Algorithms for Efficient Insulin Therapy Initiation in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: An in Silico Study.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Apr 22:19322968241245930. doi: 10.1177/19322968241245930. Online ahead of print. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024. PMID: 38646824 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical