An analysis of normative data on the knee rotatory profile and the usefulness of the Rotatometer, a new instrument for measuring tibiofemoral rotation: the reliability of the knee Rotatometer
- PMID: 24817107
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3039-9
An analysis of normative data on the knee rotatory profile and the usefulness of the Rotatometer, a new instrument for measuring tibiofemoral rotation: the reliability of the knee Rotatometer
Abstract
Purpose: This study proposes a simple and noninvasive instrument called the "Rotatometer" to measure tibiofemoral rotation and investigates its clinical applicability to the assessment of static rotational knee laxity.
Methods: The degree of tibiofemoral rotation was measured for a sample of 94 healthy volunteers with 188 knees by using the Rotatometer. The measurement was made by two independent and blinded examiners in three sessions at one-month intervals. The normative rotational profile and its relationship with gender and age were evaluated, and inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reliability were calculated.
Results: Males showed 62° ± 5° of external rotation, whereas females, 64° ± 5°. Males showed 44° ± 5° of internal rotation, whereas females, 49° ± 4°. Females showed significantly higher degrees of rotation than males. Tibiofemoral rotation was not correlated with age, and external rotation and internal rotation had a moderate positive relationship. Inter-observer reliability ranged from 0.84 to 0.91 for external rotation and 0.90 to 0.95 for internal rotation, and intra-observer reliability ranged from 0.69 to 0.89 for external rotation and 0.87 to 0.95 for internal rotation.
Conclusions: The results suggest the Rotatometer to be a simple and noninvasive device with high inter- and intra-observer reliability. The device can provide a normative rotational profile for reference purposes and thus can be used to determine the preoperative and postoperative rotational status of knees with anterior cruciate ligament injuries and compare results from different reconstruction techniques.
Comment in
-
A close look at tibiofemoral rotation measurements.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr;23(4):1266-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3263-3. Epub 2014 Sep 6. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. PMID: 25193566 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Objective measurement devices to assess static rotational knee laxity: focus on the Rotameter.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Apr;20(4):639-44. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1876-3. Epub 2012 Jan 14. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012. PMID: 22246547 Review.
-
Rotational knee laxity: reliability of a simple measurement device in vivo.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Mar 18;9:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-35. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008. PMID: 18366671 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability testing of a new device to measure tibial rotation.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Aug;17(8):920-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0772-6. Epub 2009 Mar 21. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009. PMID: 19305971
-
A novel tool for objective assessment of femorotibial rotation: a cadaver study.Int Orthop. 2011 Nov;35(11):1611-20. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1159-5. Epub 2010 Dec 22. Int Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21181404 Free PMC article.
-
The KneeKG system: a review of the literature.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Apr;20(4):633-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1867-4. Epub 2012 Jan 4. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012. PMID: 22215077 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of a simplified skin pointer device compared with a skeletal marker for knee rotation laxity: A cadaveric study using a rotation-meter.World J Orthop. 2018 Jun 18;9(6):85-91. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i6.85. eCollection 2018 Jun 18. World J Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29984195 Free PMC article.
-
A close look at tibiofemoral rotation measurements.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr;23(4):1266-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3263-3. Epub 2014 Sep 6. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. PMID: 25193566 No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources