Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jun;85(6):505-12.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-013-2668-8.

[Importance of PET in surgery of esophageal cancer]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Importance of PET in surgery of esophageal cancer]

[Article in German]
K Ott et al. Chirurg. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Perioperative or preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCTx) is nowadays standard for locally advanced esophageal cancer in Europe, as randomized studies have shown a significant survival benefit for patients with multimodal treatment. As responders and nonresponders have a significantly different prognosis, a response-based tailored preoperative treatment would be of utmost interest. An established method is a metabolic response evaluation by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). The level of metabolic response is known to be dependent on the localization, tumor entity and type of preoperative treatment. Association of FDG-PET with later response and prognosis was shown for absolute standardized uptake values (SUV) or a decrease of SUV levels before and after therapy but there are also contradictory findings in the literature and no prospective validation. However, neither time points nor cut-off for metabolic response evaluation have been defined so far. The most interesting approach seems to be early response monitoring during preoperative chemotherapy, which has shown promising results in prospective single center trials (MUNICON I/II) during chemotherapy of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), but needs to be validated in prospective multicenter trails.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Sep;8(9):797-805 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):472-8 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Oncol. 2009 Jul;4(7):875-9 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 May;36(5):735-44 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 2009 Nov 15;115(22):5184-92 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources