Similar articles

• MR cholangiopancreatography features of the biliary tree after liver transplantation.

  Novellas S, Caramella T, Fournol M, Gugenheim J, Chevallier P. Novellas S, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jul;191(1):221-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2938. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008. PMID: 18562749 Review.
• Adult bile duct strictures: role of MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in characterization.

  Katabathina VS, Dasyam AK, Dasyam N, Hosseinzadeh K. Katabathina VS, et al. Radiographics. 2014 May-Jun;34(3):565-86. doi: 10.1148/rg.343125211. Radiographics. 2014. PMID: 24819781 Review.
• Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: pearls, pitfalls, and pathology.

  Griffin N, Yu D, Alexander Grant L. Griffin N, et al. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2013 Feb;34(1):32-43. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2012.11.003. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2013. PMID: 23395316 Review.
• Education and Imaging. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic: bile duct dilatation caused by an aortic aneurysm.

  Cowell D, Pover A, Buter A, Moug SJ. Cowell D, et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Aug;25(8):1467. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06426.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010. PMID: 20659243 No abstract available.
• Evaluation of the biliary tract: the value of performing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in conjunction with a 3-D spoiled gradient-echo gadolinium enhanced dynamic sequence.

  Kim SJ, Kim S, Kim CW, Lee TH, Lee JW, Lee SH, Choo KS, Kim GH. Kim SJ, et al. Australas Radiol. 2007 Aug;51(4):309-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01751.x. Australas Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17635465 Review.