Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;64(4):608-15.
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 10.

Development of a standardized transfusion ratio as a metric for evaluating dialysis facility anemia management practices

Affiliations

Development of a standardized transfusion ratio as a metric for evaluating dialysis facility anemia management practices

Jiannong Liu et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Because transfusion avoidance has been the cornerstone of anemia treatment for patients with kidney disease, direct measurement of red blood cell transfusion use to assess dialysis facility anemia management performance is reasonable. We aimed to explore methods for estimating facility-level standardized transfusion ratios (STfRs) to assess provider anemia treatment practices.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting & participants: Point prevalent US hemodialysis patients on January 1, 2009, with Medicare as primary payer and dialysis duration of 90 days or longer were included (n = 223,901). All dialysis facilities with eligible patients were included (n = 5,345).

Predictor: Dialysis facility assignment.

Outcome: Receiving a red blood cell transfusion in the inpatient or outpatient setting.

Measurements: We evaluated 3 approaches for estimating STfR: ratio of observed to expected numbers of transfusions (STfR(obs)), a Bayesian approach (STfR(Bayes)), and a modified version of the Bayesian approach (STfR(modBayes)).

Results: The overall national transfusion rate in 2009 was 23.2 per 100 patient-years. Our model for predicting the expected number of transfusions performed well. For large facilities, all 3 STfRs worked well. However, for small facilities, while the STfR(modBayes) worked well, STfR(obs) values demonstrated instability and the STfR(Bayes) may produce more bias.

Limitations: Administration of transfusions to dialysis patients reflects medical practice both within and outside the dialysis unit. Some transfusions may be deemed unavoidable and transfusion practices are subject to considerable regional variation.

Conclusions: Development of an STfR metric is feasible and reasonable for assessing anemia treatment at dialysis facilities. The STfR(obs) is simple to calculate and works well for larger dialysis facilities. The STfR(modBayes) is more analytically complex, but facilitates comparisons across all dialysis facilities, including small facilities.

Keywords: Anemia; Bayesian approach; anemia management; dialysis; end-stage renal disease (ESRD); facility-level practice; standardized ratio; transfusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources