Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 May-Jun;12(3):233-40.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1624.

Implementing asthma guidelines using practice facilitation and local learning collaboratives: a randomized controlled trial

James W Mold  1 , Chester Fox, Angela Wisniewski, Paula Darby Lipman, Margot R Krauss, D Robert Harris, Cheryl Aspy, Rachel A Cohen, Kurt Elward, Paul Frame, Barbara P Yawn, Leif I Solberg, René Gonin
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Implementing asthma guidelines using practice facilitation and local learning collaboratives: a randomized controlled trial

James W Mold et al. Ann Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Guideline implementation in primary care has proven difficult. Although external assistance through performance feedback, academic detailing, practice facilitation (PF), and learning collaboratives seems to help, the best combination of interventions has not been determined.

Methods: In a cluster randomized trial, we compared the independent and combined effectiveness of PF and local learning collaboratives (LLCs), combined with performance feedback and academic detailing, with performance feedback and academic detailing alone on implementation of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's Asthma Guidelines. The study was conducted in 3 primary care practice-based research networks. Medical records of patients with asthma seen during pre- and postintervention periods were abstracted to determine adherence to 6 guideline recommendations. McNemar's test and multivariate modeling were used to evaluate the impact of the interventions.

Results: Across 43 practices, 1,016 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall, adherence to all 6 recommendations increased (P ≤.002). Examination of improvement by study arm in unadjusted analyses showed that practices in the control arm significantly improved adherence to 2 of 6 recommendations, whereas practices in the PF arm improved in 3, practices in the LLCs improved in 4, and practices in the PF + LLC arm improved in 5 of 6 recommendations. In multivariate modeling, PF practices significantly improved assessment of asthma severity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5, 95% CI, 1.7-3.8) and assessment of asthma level of control (OR = 2.3, 95% CI, 1.5-3.5) compared with control practices. Practices assigned to LLCs did not improve significantly more than control practices for any recommendation.

Conclusions: Addition of PF to performance feedback and academic detailing was helpful to practices attempting to improve adherence to asthma guidelines.

Keywords: asthma; practice facilitation; practice guidelines as topic; practice-based research network; primary health care; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Yawn BP, Yawn RA. Measuring asthma quality in primary care: can we develop better measures? Respir Med. 2006;100(1):26–33 - PubMed
    1. Cabana MD, Slish KK, Nan B, Lin X, Clark NM. Asking the correct questions to assess asthma symptoms. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2005;44(4):319–325 - PubMed
    1. Diette GB, Skinner EA, Markson LE, et al. Consistency of care with national guidelines for children with asthma in managed care. J Pediatr. 2001;138(1):59–64 - PubMed
    1. Diette GB, Patino CM, Merriman B, et al. Patient factors that physicians use to assign asthma treatment. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1360–1366 - PubMed
    1. Apter AJ, Van Hoof TJ, Sherwin TE, Casey BA, Petrillo MK, Meehan TP. Assessing the quality of asthma care provided to Medicaid patients enrolled in managed care organizations in Connecticut. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001;86(2):211–218 - PubMed

Publication types