Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;51(4):273-7.
doi: 10.1007/s13312-014-0400-5.

Cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in early chronic kidney disease

Affiliations
Free article

Cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in early chronic kidney disease

Pankaj Hari et al. Indian Pediatr. 2014 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To compare performance of combined creatinine and cystatin C-based equation with equations based on either cystatin C or creatinine alone, in early chronic kidney disease.

Design: Diagnostic accuracy study.

Setting: Tertiary-care hospital.

Patients: One hundred children with chronic kidney disease who underwent 99mTc diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) glomerular filtration rate measurement.

Methods: Estimating equations for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine were generated using regression analyses. These equations and the creatinine-based equation [0.42 x height/creatinine] were validated in 42 children with glomerular filtration rate between 60 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Bias, precision and accuracy of estimating equations using DTPA glomerular filtration rate as gold standard.

Results: Cystatin C-based equation (GFR=96.9 - 30.4 x cystatin) overestimated while the combined cystatin C-and creatinine-based equation [GFR=11.45 x (height/creatinine) 0.356 x (1/cystatin) 0.188] underestimated the measured GFR. Cystatin C-based equation had less bias (1.9 vs. 12.4 ml/min/1.73 m2), and higher precision (13.1 vs. 25.6 mL/min/1.73 m2) and accuracy (92.1% vs. 75.7%) than creatinine-based equation. The combined cystatin C and creatinine equation had bias (-1.4 mL/min/1.73 m2) precision (15.2 mL/min/1.73 m2) and accuracy (91.2%) similar to cystatin C-based equation.

Conclusions: Cystatin C-based equation has a better performance in estimating glomerular filtration rate than creatinine-based equation in children with early chronic kidney disease. Addition of creatinine equation does not improve the performance of the cystatin C-based equation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources