Using reduced personal protective equipment in an endemically infected mouse colony
- PMID: 24827569
- PMCID: PMC4128565
Using reduced personal protective equipment in an endemically infected mouse colony
Abstract
Personal protective equipment (PPE) frequently is used to reduce the risk of spreading adventitial diseases in rodent colonies. The PPE worn often reflects the historic practices of the research institution rather than published performance data. Standard PPE for a rodent facility typically consists of a disposable hair bonnet, gown, face mask, shoe covers, and gloves, which are donned on facility entry and removed on exiting. This study evaluated the effect of a reduced PPE protocol on disease spread within an endemically infected mouse colony. In the reduced protocol, only the parts of the wearer that came in direct contact with the mice or their environment were covered with PPE. To test the reduced PPE protocol, proven naïve mice were housed in a facility endemically infected with murine norovirus and mouse hepatitis virus for 12 wk. During that time, routine husbandry operations were conducted by using either the standard or reduced PPE protocols. All study mice remained free of virus antibody when reduced PPE was implemented. These results indicate that reduced PPE is adequate for disease containment when correct techniques for handling microisolation caging are used. Reducing the amount of PPE used in an animal facility affords considerable cost savings yet limits the risk of disease spread.
Figures
References
-
- American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine. [Internet]. 2010. ACLAM 2010 Forum Committee: personal protective equipment questionnaire. [Cited 11 July 13]. Available at: http://www.aclam.org/Content/files/files/Public/Active/forum2010_ppe_sur...
-
- Allen KP, Csida T, Leming J, Murray K, Thulin J. 2010. Efficacy of footwear disinfection and shoe cover use in an animal research facility. Lab Anim (NY) 39:107–111 - PubMed
-
- Cannon JL, Papafragkou E, Park GW, Osborne J, Jaykus LA, Vinje J. 2006. Surrogates for the study of norovirus stability and inactivation in the environment: a comparison of murine norovirus and feline calicivirus. J Food Prot 69:2761–2765 - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institutes of Health 2009. Appendix A - primary containment for biohazards: selection, installation, and use of biological safety cabinets. In: Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories, 5th ed. Washington (DC): Department of Health and Human Services
-
- Clifford CB, Clifford C. 2001. Samples, sample selection, and statistics: living with uncertainty. Lab Anim (NY) 30:26–31 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources