Practitioner review: A critical perspective on gene-environment interaction models--what impact should they have on clinical perceptions and practice?
- PMID: 24828285
- PMCID: PMC4961234
- DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12261
Practitioner review: A critical perspective on gene-environment interaction models--what impact should they have on clinical perceptions and practice?
Abstract
Background: Psychiatric disorders run in families, and early twin, family and adoption studies confirmed that this was due in part to shared genetic inheritance. While candidate gene studies largely failed to reliably identify genetic variants associated with psychiatric disorders, genome-wide association studies are beginning to do so. However, the proportion of phenotypic variance explained remains well below what would be expected from previous heritability estimates.
Scope: We review possible reasons for this 'missing heritability', and whether incorporating gene by environment interactions into our models will substantially improve our understanding of the aetiology of psychiatric disorders, and inform clinical perceptions and practice.
Findings: We discuss potential limitations of the gene by environment interaction approach. In particular, we discuss whether these are likely to be a major contributor to psychiatric disorders at the level of the specific interaction (as opposed to at an aggregate level).
Conclusions: Gene by environment interaction studies offered initial promise that a far greater proportion of phenotypic variance could be explained by incorporating measures of environmental exposures into genetic studies. However, in our opinion, there are few (if any) clear examples of gene by environment interactions in psychiatry, and their scope for informing either our understanding of disease pathology or clinical practice remains limited at present.
Keywords: Genetics; gene × environment interaction; genome-wide association studies; heritability; psychiatric disorder.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. © 2014 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
Comment in
-
Commentary: Response to commentary by Rutter on Munafo et al. (2014).J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;55(10):1105-6. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12308. Epub 2014 Aug 6. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 25098210 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Commentary: G × E in child psychiatry and psychology: a broadening of the scope of enquiry as prompted by Munafò et al. (2014).J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;55(10):1102-4. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12309. Epub 2014 Aug 6. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 25098372 No abstract available.
References
-
- Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van Ijzendoorn MH. Differential susceptibility to rearing environment depending on dopamine-related genes: new evidence and a meta-analysis. Dev Psychopathol. 2011;23:39–52. - PubMed
-
- Barr CS, Newman TK, Lindell S, Shannon C, Champoux M, Lesch KP, Suomi SJ, Goldman D, Higley JD. Interaction between serotonin transporter gene variation and rearing condition in alcohol preference and consumption in female primates. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004a;61:1146–1152. - PubMed
-
- Barr CS, Newman TK, Schwandt M, Shannon C, Dvoskin RL, Lindell SG, Taubman J, Thompson B, Champoux M, Lesch KP, Goldman D, et al. Sexual dichotomy of an interaction between early adversity and the serotonin transporter gene promoter variant in rhesus macaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004b;101:12358–12363. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical