Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 14:4:4955.
doi: 10.1038/srep04955.

Pannexins form gap junctions with electrophysiological and pharmacological properties distinct from connexins

Affiliations

Pannexins form gap junctions with electrophysiological and pharmacological properties distinct from connexins

Giriraj Sahu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Stable expression of pannexin 1 (Panx1) and pannexin 3 (Panx3) resulted in functional gap junctions (GJs) in HeLa cells, but not in Neuro-2a (N2a) or PC-12 cells. The glycosylation pattern of expressed Panx1 varied greatly among different cell lines. In contrast to connexin (Cx) containing GJs (Cx-GJs), junctional conductance (Gj) of pannexin GJs (Panx-GJs) is very less sensitive to junctional voltage. Both Panx1 and Panx3 junctions favoured anionic dyes over cations to permeate. Though, carbenoxolone (CBX) and probenecid blocked Panx1 hemichannel activity, they had no effect on Panx1-GJs or Panx3-GJs. Extracellular loop 1 (E1) of Panx1 possibly bears the binding pocket. The Cx-GJ blocker heptanol blocked neither Panx1 hemichannel nor Panx-GJs. Unlike the GJs formed by most Cxs, CO2 did not uncouple Panx-GJs completely. Oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD) caused lesser uncoupling of Panx-GJs compared to Cx43-GJs. These findings demonstrate properties of Panx-GJs that are distinctly different from Cx-GJs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Panx1 and Panx3 form functional gap junctions (GJs) in HeLa cell.
The cartoon diagram represents recording of junctional currents using dual patch clamp. Series of voltage (V1) steps were applied to cell-1, keeping the voltage of cell-2 (V2) constant at 0 mV. Junctional current (Ij) corresponds to the current recorded from cell-2. Representative Ij traces are depicted in (A, B and C). Panx1 and Panx3 (A and B) transfected cells exhibited significant Ij. (C) non-transfected control HeLa cells showed much less Ij, compared to Panx1 and Panx3 expressing cells. (D and E) Vj-Gj(ss) plots of Panx1 and Panx3 compared with that of Cx43. Gj(ss) of both Panx1 and Panx3 remained relatively unchanged with increasing Vj. Gj(ss) of Cx43 showed voltage dependence in similar experimental conditions. Values are the mean ± SEM of 4–11 independent experiments. The dashed line in the Cx43 plot represents the fitted curve with the two states Boltzmann equation. (F) Vj-Gj(ss) plot of endogenous GJ, recorded from non-transfected wild type (WT) HeLa cells (n = 7). The sharp decrease of Gj(ss) with increasing Vj resembles the Vj-Gj relation of Cx45-GJs.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Differential glycosylation pattern of Panx1.
(A) Representative western blots of Panx1-eGFP, expressed in N2a, HeLa and PC-12 cells. 50 μg of total proteins were resolved on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The protein was transferred to PVD membrane and probed with anti-GFP antibody. The higher molecular weight band corresponds to the glycosylated form. (B) The glycosylated Panx1 band disappeared upon treatment with 10 units of PNGase-F for 30 minutes. Corresponding bands of Panx1 (A and B) are cropped from the full blots and presented. Picture of the full-length blots are shown in supplementary section. (C) Comparison of the glycosylated fraction of Panx1 in different cell lines. In N2a and PC-12 cells, 43 ± 3% and 79 ± 3% of total Panx1 are glycosylated, whereas, in HeLa cells, glycosylated fraction represents only 8 ± 2% of total Panx1. Band intensity was quantified with Image J software. Values are the mean ± SEM of seven experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pannexin gap junctions are permeable to anionic but not to cationic dyes.
Passage of fluorescent dyes through (A) Panx1 and (B) Panx3 GJs. Dye was injected in one cell of a pair (donor cell; Cell-1) through the patch pipette and its passage to the recipient cell (Cell-2) was monitored. In 5 minutes time, anionic Alxa 350 reached to the recipient cell both through Panx1 and Panx3 GJs. None of the cationic dyes (e.g. PI, EtBr and DAPI) passed through Panx1 and Panx3 GJs, indicating the cells are not connected by cytoplasmic bridges. Dyes were not detected in the recipient cells even after 10 minutes. Cell-cell coupling was confirmed in every cell pair by measuring Gj at the end of the experiment. (C) As a positive control, Cx43-GJs expressed in HeLa cells showed the permeation of both anionic and cationic dyes. ‘BF' represents bright field image.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Pannexin gap junctions are insensitive to CBX, probenecid and heptanol.
(A) Representative Vj protocol- and Ij recorded from a Panx1 stably transfected cell pair. Ij was not inhibited in presence of 30 μM CBX. Solid bar over the current trace represents duration of CBX application. (B) Effect of different blockers on Gj of Panx and Cx43 junctions. Gj was measured at +40 mV of Vj. CBX and probenecid (2 mM) did not change the Gj of Panx-GJs in 5 minutes. Gj of Cx43 was reduced by 30–42% with CBX and probenecid, respectively. 2 mM heptanol completely uncoupled Cx43 junctions within 1–2 minutes. However heptanol had no effect on Panx-GJs. Data are the mean ± SEM of 6-11 independent experiments.
Figure 5
Figure 5. CBX and probenecid have no effect on chimeric Panx1 hemichannels, bearing the first extracellular loop (E1) of Cx43.
(A) I-V curve generated from mock (peGFPN1) transfected CHO cells, did not show Panx1 type currents. (B) I-V curve of Panx1, recorded from transfected CHO cells. Panx1 hemichannel currents were inhibited promptly (within 1–2 min) by 30 μM CBX (red line) and 2 mM probenecid (blue line). (C) Panx1-E1-Cx43 exhibited similar I-V characteristics as wild type Panx1, but was not inhibited either by CBX or by probenecid. (D) I-V curve generated from Panx1-E2-Cx43 did not show significant currents.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Acidosis and Oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD) uncoupled Pannnexin junctions to a lesser extent than Cx43 junction.
Acidosis was achieved by saturating external solution with 100% CO2. (A) Representative junctional current traces showing the effect of CO2 on Panx1-GJs and Cx43-GJs. Although CO2 uncoupled Cx43 junction rapidly it had little inhibitory effect on Panx junctions. Solid lines over the current traces represent duration of CO2 application. (B) Inhibition of Gj by CO2 and OGD. OGD was achieved as described in the method section. Both Panx1-GJs and Panx3-GJs were inhibited by CO2 and OGD to much lesser extent, compared to Cx43-GJs. Values are the mean ± SEM of 7-11 experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Panchin Y. et al. A ubiquitous family of putative gap junction molecules. Curr Biol 10, R473–474 (2000). - PubMed
    1. Baranova A. et al. The mammalian pannexin family is homologous to the invertebrate innexin gap junction proteins. Genomics 83, 706–716 (2004). - PubMed
    1. Bruzzone R. et al. Pannexins, a family of gap junction proteins expressed in brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 13644–13649 (2003). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Panchin Y. V. Evolution of gap junction proteins--the pannexin alternative. J Exp Biol 208, 1415–1419 (2005). - PubMed
    1. Swayne L. A., Sorbara C. D. & Bennett S. A. Pannexin 2 is expressed by postnatal hippocampal neural progenitors and modulates neuronal commitment. J Biol Chem 285, 24977–24986 (2010). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources