Observations on Chlamydia trachomatis and other microbes in reactive arthritis

Abstract

There are problems in attributing causality in inflammatory arthritis. So far as C. trachomatis and sexually acquired reactive arthritis are concerned, there is much in favour of a causal relationship, although there are important caveats which need to be explored before it is possible to say unreservedly that C. trachomatis plays a causative role in reactive arthritis. For example, micro-organisms have never been cultured from synovial effusions in early disease, and only once has substantial benefit of antimicrobial treatment been reported. The claim that ocular strains of C. trachomatis are of over-riding importance in pathogenesis needs confirmation before it can be accepted. No conclusion can be made about the possibility of other small intracellular bacteria in joints having a role in causing disease. However, if it can be shown that eradication of the micro-organism, which may be difficult to prove, coincides with clinical recovery, it would go some way to recognising causality. In spite of the recognised difficulties, antibiotic studies have an important role in identifying aetiology. They need to focus on very early disease and on eradication of intra-articular bacteria. Treatment of established disease is likely to be less informative. Although a combination of antibiotics might have a future in treating established disease, diagnosing and treating non-gonococcal urethritis as soon as possible should be the aim in order to prevent the development of reactive arthritis.

Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis; SARA; Sexually transmitted infections; non-gonococcal urethritis; reactive arthritis; sexually acquired reactive arthritis.