Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity
- PMID: 24830906
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-014-0298-y
Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity
Abstract
Research suggests that the desire to behave sexually with a partner (dyadic sexual desire) may reflect desire for intimacy whereas solitary sexual desire may reflect pleasure seeking motivations more generally. Because direct reproductive success can only be increased with a sexual partner, we tested whether dyadic sexual desire was a better predictor of women's preferences for lower pitched men's voices (a marker of relatively high reproductive success) than was solitary sexual desire. In Study 1, women (N = 95) with higher dyadic sexual desire scores on the Sexual Desire Inventory-2 preferred masculinized male voices more than did women with lower dyadic sexual desire scores. We did not find a significant relationship between women's vocal masculinity preferences and their solitary sexual desire scores. In Study 2, we tested whether the relationship between voice preferences and dyadic sexual desire scores was related to differences in sociosexual orientation. Women (N = 80) with more positive attitudes towards uncommitted sex had stronger vocal masculinity preferences regardless of whether men's attractiveness was judged for short-term or long-term relationships. Independent of the effect of sociosexual attitudes, dyadic sexual desire positively predicted women's masculinity preferences when assessing men's attractiveness for short-term but not long-term relationships. These effects were independent of women's own relationship status and hormonal contraceptive use. Our results provide further evidence that women's mate preferences may independently reflect individual differences in both sexual desire and openness to short-term relationships, potentially with the ultimate function of maximizing the fitness benefits of women's mate choices.
Similar articles
-
Mating Strategies and the Masculinity Paradox: How Relationship Context, Relationship Status, and Sociosexuality Shape Women's Preferences for Facial Masculinity and Beardedness.Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Apr;49(3):809-820. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-1437-2. Epub 2019 Apr 23. Arch Sex Behav. 2020. PMID: 31016490
-
Changes in salivary estradiol predict changes in women's preferences for vocal masculinity.Horm Behav. 2014 Aug;66(3):493-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 19. Horm Behav. 2014. PMID: 25051294 Clinical Trial.
-
Do women's preferences for masculine voices shift across the ovulatory cycle?Horm Behav. 2018 Nov;106:122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Horm Behav. 2018. PMID: 30342884
-
Sexual selection on human faces and voices.J Sex Res. 2012;49(2-3):227-43. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.658924. J Sex Res. 2012. PMID: 22380590 Review.
-
Dyadic Sexual Desire in Romantic Relationships: The Dyadic Interactions Affecting Dyadic Sexual Desire Model.Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jan;51(1):417-440. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02165-8. Epub 2022 Jan 15. Arch Sex Behav. 2022. PMID: 35031906 Review.
Cited by
-
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jun;53(6):2111-2122. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02883-9. Epub 2024 May 20. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 38769279
-
The Role of Emotion Projection, Sexual Desire, and Self-Rated Attractiveness in the Sexual Overperception Bias.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Aug;50(6):2507-2516. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02017-5. Epub 2021 Aug 13. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 34389894 Free PMC article.
-
Self-rated Attractiveness and Sociosexual Behavior Predict Gay Men's Preferences for Masculine Cues in Male Voices in China.Evol Psychol. 2019 Apr-Jun;17(2):1474704919847430. doi: 10.1177/1474704919847430. Evol Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31068003 Free PMC article.
-
The scent of mating strategy: sociosexual orientation was associated with olfaction and body odor sniffing behavior in Chinese and American populations.BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 22;13(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03134-9. BMC Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40696446 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources