Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(4):E1-E12.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000153.

Communicating risk with relatives in a familial hypercholesterolemia cascade screening program: a summary of the evidence

Affiliations
Review

Communicating risk with relatives in a familial hypercholesterolemia cascade screening program: a summary of the evidence

Melanie Allison. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common inherited, potentially deadly disease, affecting an estimated 600 000 people in the United States. When FH is undiagnosed and untreated, it is linked with early coronary heart disease in more than 50% of men by age 50 years and 30% of women by age 60 years. Cascade screening is the most cost effective method available to identify family members with this disease; however, cascade screening guidelines do not specify best methods to use when contacting relatives. Therefore, I conducted an exhaustive search of the literature to find the most successful communication methods used in contact tracing and cascade screening.

Purpose: The purpose of this summary of the evidence was to identify the communication method with greatest impact in having at-risk populations present to a provider for disease screening. These findings will inform clinicians of the most successful methods to implement when cascade screening relatives of known FH patients.

Conclusions: Most studies support direct contact of relatives via letter, mailed from the provider. Provider-initiated communication more often resulted in relatives being tested when compared with other methods of communication.

Clinical implications: On the basis of the literature, family members of current FH patients will be more likely to present to a provider for cascade screening if they receive written communication from the provider.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources