Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q
- PMID: 24831775
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2981-z
Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q
Abstract
Staged expander-implant breast reconstruction (EIBR) and microsurgical abdominal flap breast reconstruction (MAFBR) are the most common modes of breast reconstruction (BR) in the United States. Whether the mode of breast reconstruction has an impact on patient quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction remains a question. A retrospective study was conducted identifying a population of 119 patients who underwent unilateral immediate BR. Only patients who were eligible for either EIBR or MAFBR based on preoperative characteristics were included in the study. The following parameters were retrieved: demographics, mode of reconstruction, cancer, recovery, QoL, and patient satisfaction. The latter two parameters were determined using the BREAST-Q BR module questionnaire. Two-way analysis of variance with mode of reconstruction and occurrence of complication as independent variables was used to determine the effect on patient satisfaction and QoL. The association between mode of reconstruction and patient response with each item of the QoL and satisfaction survey domains was analyzed. The overall response rate was 62.2 %. Non-respondents and respondents did not significantly differ in demographics, surgery type, cancer staging, adjuvant therapy, and complication rate. Age and BMI were significantly higher in MAFBR, while level of education was higher in EIBR. MAFBR had higher scores in psychosocial and sexual wellbeing, satisfaction with outcome, breast, information, and plastic surgeon when compared with patients who underwent EIBR. For patients eligible for both MAFBR and EIBR, MAFBR is associated with higher levels of satisfaction and QoL. Comprehensive pre-operative information of pros and cons of both modes of BR is crucial for patients to make a well-informed decision, thus, resulting in higher levels of satisfaction.
Similar articles
-
Outcome analysis of expander/implant versus microsurgical abdominal flap breast reconstruction: a critical study of 254 cases.Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;21(6):2074-82. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3521-0. Epub 2014 Feb 21. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24558063
-
Immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction followed by post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer: Aesthetic, surgical, satisfaction and quality of life outcomes in women with high-risk breast cancer.Breast. 2016 Dec;30:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Sep 7. Breast. 2016. PMID: 27611237
-
Implant breast reconstruction and radiation: a multicenter analysis of long-term health-related quality of life and satisfaction.Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;21(7):2159-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3483-2. Epub 2014 Apr 18. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24740825
-
Breast reconstruction after mastectomy.Coll Antropol. 2010 Mar;34 Suppl 1:113-23. Coll Antropol. 2010. PMID: 20402306 Review.
-
Patient-centered outcomes of breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy: A comprehensive review of the literature.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Jun;70(6):768-780. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 28. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017. PMID: 28416138 Review.
Cited by
-
Breast reconstruction and quality of life five years after cancer diagnosis: VICAN French National cohort.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(2):449-461. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06626-z. Epub 2022 May 24. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022. PMID: 35608713
-
Patients' Satisfaction After Breast Reconstruction Surgery Using Autologous versus Implants: A Meta-Analysis.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Apr 1;25(4):1205-1212. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.4.1205. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024. PMID: 38679979 Free PMC article.
-
Abdominal Flap-based Breast Reconstruction versus Abdominoplasty: The Impact of Surgical Procedure on Scar Location.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 24;8(9):e3112. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003112. eCollection 2020 Sep. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020. PMID: 33133961 Free PMC article.
-
Autologous vs. implant-based breast reconstruction after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy-A deeper insight considering surgical and patient-reported outcomes.Front Surg. 2022 Sep 5;9:903734. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.903734. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36132203 Free PMC article.
-
Paravertebral blocks and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in breast reconstructive surgery: patient selection and perspectives.J Pain Res. 2018 Aug 23;11:1567-1581. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S148544. eCollection 2018. J Pain Res. 2018. PMID: 30197532 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous