System Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers
- PMID: 24832146
- PMCID: PMC4250445
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301790
System Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers
Abstract
Objectives. We assessed the protocols and system processes for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in 4 midwestern states. Methods. We identified 49 FQHCs in 4 states. In January 2013, we mailed their medical directors a 49-item questionnaire about policies on CRC screening, use of electronic medical records, types of CRC screening recommended, clinic tracking systems, referrals for colonoscopy, and barriers to providing CRC. Results. Forty-four questionnaires (90%) were returned. Thirty-three of the respondents (75%) estimated the proportion of their patients up-to-date with CRC screening, with a mean of 35%. One major barrier to screening was inability to provide colonoscopy for patients with a positive fecal occult blood test (59%). The correlation of system strategies and estimated percentage of patients up-to-date with CRC screening was 0.43 (P = .01). Conclusions. CRC system strategies were associated with higher CRC screening rates. Implementing system strategies for CRC screening takes time and effort and is important to maintain, to help prevent, or to cure many cases of CRC, the second leading cause of cancer in the United States.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(10):1-40. Epub 2009 Sep 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009. PMID: 23074514 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers.J Community Health. 2018 Dec;43(6):1044-1052. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0520-2. J Community Health. 2018. PMID: 29770945 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic colonoscopy completion after abnormal fecal immunochemical testing and quality of tests used at 8 Federally Qualified Health Centers in Southern California: Opportunities for improving screening outcomes.Cancer. 2019 Dec 1;125(23):4203-4209. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32440. Epub 2019 Sep 3. Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31479529 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the processes that Federally Qualified Health Centers use to select and implement colorectal cancer screening interventions: a qualitative study.Transl Behav Med. 2020 May 20;10(2):394-403. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz023. Transl Behav Med. 2020. PMID: 30794725 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1645-1658. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 30326005 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Factors Affecting Adherence in a Pragmatic Trial of Annual Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer.J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):978-985. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4820-0. Epub 2019 Jan 25. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 30684199 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Association of Primary and Specialty Care Integration on Physician Communication and Cancer Screening in Safety-Net Clinics.Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Oct 29;17:E134. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200025. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020. PMID: 33119485 Free PMC article.
-
Centralized colorectal cancer screening outreach and patient navigation for vulnerable populations in North Carolina: study protocol for the SCORE randomized controlled trial.Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Oct 7;2(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00194-x. Implement Sci Commun. 2021. PMID: 34620250 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Uptake of Evidence-Based Interventions in 355 Clinics Partnering With the Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2015-2018.Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 May 19;19:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210258. Prev Chronic Dis. 2022. PMID: 35588522 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods.J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):815-822. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06186-2. Epub 2020 Oct 26. J Gen Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 33107003 Free PMC article.
References
-
- 2012 Program grantee comparison data. Health Resources and Services Administration, Primary Care: the Health Center Program. Available at: http://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx?year=2012&state=IA&compare=Nat. Accessed October 22, 2013.
-
- Forrest CB, Whelan EM. Primary care safety-net delivery sites in the United States: a comparison of community health centers, hospital outpatient departments, and physicians’ offices. JAMA. 2000;284(16):2077–2083. - PubMed
-
- Federally qualified health centers. Report to the Congress: Medicare and the health care delivery system. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Available at: http://www.medpac.gov/chapters/Jun11_Ch06.pdf. Published June, 2011. Accessed October 22, 2013.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Screen for life: colorectal cancer, basic facts on screening. Publication #99-6949. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/pdf/Basics_FS_Eng_color.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2012.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50–75 years—United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(26):808–812. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources