New national allocation policy for deceased donor kidneys in the United States and possible effect on patient outcomes
- PMID: 24833128
- PMCID: PMC4116061
- DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2013070784
New national allocation policy for deceased donor kidneys in the United States and possible effect on patient outcomes
Abstract
In 2013, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network in the United States approved a new national deceased donor kidney allocation policy that introduces the kidney donor profile index (KDPI), which gives scores of 0%-100% based on 10 donor factors. Kidneys with lower KDPI scores are associated with better post-transplant survival. Important features of the new policy include first allocating kidneys from donors with a KDPI≤20% to candidates in the top 20th percentile of estimated post-transplant survival, adding waiting time from dialysis initiation, conferring priority points for a calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA)>19%, broader sharing of kidneys for candidates with a CPRA≥99%, broader sharing of kidneys from donors with a KDPI>85%, eliminating the payback system, and allocating blood type A2 and A2B kidneys to blood type B candidates. We simulated the distribution of kidneys under the new policy compared with the current allocation policy. The simulation showed increases in projected median allograft years of life with the new policy (9.07 years) compared with the current policy (8.82 years). With the new policy, candidates with a CPRA>20%, with blood type B, and aged 18-49 years were more likely to undergo transplant, but transplants declined in candidates aged 50-64 years (4.1% decline) and ≥65 years (2.7% decline). These simulations demonstrate that the new deceased donor kidney allocation policy may improve overall post-transplant survival and access for highly sensitized candidates, with minimal effects on access to transplant by race/ethnicity and declines in kidney allocation for candidates aged ≥50 years.
Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Nephrology.
Figures



Comment in
-
Simulating the new kidney allocation policy in the United States: modest gains and many unknowns.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1617-9. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014030235. Epub 2014 May 15. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014. PMID: 24833124 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Allocation of the Highest Quality Kidneys and Transplant Outcomes Under the New Kidney Allocation System.Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 May;73(5):605-614. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Mar 28. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019. PMID: 30929853
-
Regional Disparities in Transplantation With Deceased Donor Kidneys With Kidney Donor Profile Index Less Than 20% Among Candidates With Top 20% Estimated Post Transplant Survival.Prog Transplant. 2019 Dec;29(4):354-360. doi: 10.1177/1526924819874699. Epub 2019 Sep 10. Prog Transplant. 2019. PMID: 31506000 Free PMC article.
-
Allocating Deceased Donor Kidneys to Candidates with High Panel-Reactive Antibodies.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Mar 7;11(3):505-11. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07720715. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 26839235 Free PMC article.
-
Old versus new: Progress in reaching the goals of the new kidney allocation system.Hum Immunol. 2017 Jan;78(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 12. Hum Immunol. 2017. PMID: 27527922 Review.
-
A critical assessment on kidney allocation systems.Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2017 Jan;31(1):61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 8. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2017. PMID: 27919635 Review.
Cited by
-
Apolipoprotein L1: role in the evaluation of kidney transplant donors.Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2020 Nov;29(6):645-655. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000653. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2020. PMID: 33009133 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Racial Disparities With Access to Kidney Transplant After the Implementation of the New Kidney Allocation System.JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):618-625. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0512. JAMA Surg. 2019. PMID: 30942882 Free PMC article.
-
Equity in kidney transplantation: Policy change is only the first step.Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug;18(8):1839-1840. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14743. Epub 2018 Apr 17. Am J Transplant. 2018. PMID: 29603627 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Screening for coronary artery disease in kidney transplant candidates.J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Apr;22(2):297-300. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-0006-2. Epub 2014 Oct 9. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25294435 No abstract available.
-
APOL1 Genotype and Kidney Transplantation Outcomes From Deceased African American Donors.Transplantation. 2016 Jan;100(1):194-202. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000969. Transplantation. 2016. PMID: 26566060 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Smith JM, Biggins SW, Haselby DG, Kim WR, Wedd J, Lamb K, Thompson B, Segev DL, Gustafson S, Kandaswamy R, Stock PG, Matas AJ, Samana CJ, Sleeman EF, Stewart D, Harper A, Edwards E, Snyder JJ, Kasiske BL, Israni AK: Kidney, pancreas and liver allocation and distribution in the United States. Am J Transplant 12: 3191–3212, 2012 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kasiske BL, London W, Ellison MD: Race and socioeconomic factors influencing early placement on the kidney transplant waiting list. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 2142–2147, 1998 - PubMed
-
- Kasiske BL, Snyder JJ, Matas AJ, Ellison MD, Gill JS, Kausz AT: Preemptive kidney transplantation: The advantage and the advantaged. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 1358–1364, 2002 - PubMed
-
- Alexander GC, Sehgal AR: Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor. JAMA 280: 1148–1152, 1998 - PubMed
-
- Matas AJ, Smith JM, Skeans MA, Lamb KE, Gustafson SK, Samana CJ, Stewart DE, Snyder JJ, Israni AK, Kasiske BL: OPTN/SRTR 2011 annual data report: kidney. Am J Transplant 13(s1): 11–46, 2013 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical