Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jun;16(3):199-207.
doi: 10.3109/17549507.2014.904441.

On the importance of listening comprehension

Affiliations
Review

On the importance of listening comprehension

Tiffany P Hogan et al. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

The simple view of reading highlights the importance of two primary components which account for individual differences in reading comprehension across development: word recognition (i.e., decoding) and listening comprehension. While assessments and interventions for decoding have been the focus of pedagogy in the past several decades, the importance of listening comprehension has received less attention. This paper reviews evidence showing that listening comprehension becomes the dominating influence on reading comprehension starting even in the elementary grades. It also highlights a growing number of children who fail to develop adequate reading comprehension skills, primarily due to deficient listening comprehension skills (i.e., poor comprehenders). Finally we discuss key language influences on listening comprehension for consideration during assessment and treatment of reading disabilities.

Keywords: Listening; comprehension; language; literacy; poor comprehender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simple view of reading (Gough & Tumner, 1986).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The changing nature of reading comprehension and poor reader sub-groups over time. Graphs show the percentage of variance accounted for by word recognition, listening comprehension, and the shared variance of the two to explain reading comprehension, alongside the percentage of each poor reader sub-type amongst poor readers across 2nd, 4th, and 8th grades (Catts et al., 2005).

References

    1. Adlof SM, Catts HW. Classification of children with poor reading comprehension; Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; Boston, MA. 2007.
    1. Adlof SM, Catts HW, Little TD. Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing. 2006;19:933–958.
    1. Beck IL, Perfetti CA, McKeown MG. Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1982;74:506.
    1. Braze D, Tabor W, Shankweiler DP, Mencl WE. Speaking up for vocabulary reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2007;40:226–243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowyer-Crane C, Snowling MJ. Assessing children’s inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure? The British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2005;75:189–201. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources