Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- PMID: 24837265
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.038
Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Abstract
This study evaluated 2-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria and 3-dimensional (3D) TTE for assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. In 71 patients, 2D TTE, 3D TTE, and CMR imaging were performed to assess AR severity after TAVI. Using 2D TTE, AR severity was graded according to VARC-2 criteria and regurgitant volume (RVol) was determined. Three-dimensional color Doppler TTE allowed direct planimetry of the vena contracta area of the paravalvular regurgitation jet and calculation of the RVol as product with the velocity-time integral. RVol by CMR imaging was measured by phase-contrast velocity mapping in the ascending aorta. After TAVI, mean RVol determined by CMR imaging was 9.2 ± 9.6 ml/beat and mean regurgitant fraction was 13.3 ± 10.3%. AR was assessed as none or mild in 58 patients (82%) by CMR imaging. Correlation of 3D TTE and CMR imaging on RVol was better than correlation of 2D TTE and CMR imaging (r = 0.895 vs 0.558, p <0.001). There was good agreement between RVol by CMR imaging and by 3D TTE (mean bias = 2.4 ml/beat). Kappa on grading of AR severity was 0.357 between VARC-2 and CMR imaging versus 0.446 between 3D TTE and CMR imaging. Intraobserver variability for analysis of RVol of AR after TAVI was 73.5 ± 52.2% by 2D TTE, 16.7 ± 21.9% by 3D TTE, and 2.2 ± 2.0% by CMR imaging. In conclusion, 2D TTE considering VARC-2 criteria has limitations in the grading of AR severity after TAVI when CMR imaging is used for comparison. Three-dimensional TTE allows quantification of AR with greater accuracy than 2D TTE. Observer variability on RVol after TAVI is considerable using 2D TTE, significantly less using 3D TTE, and very low using CMR imaging.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment and quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Heart. 2014 Dec;100(24):1924-32. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305615. Epub 2014 Aug 14. Heart. 2014. PMID: 25124218
-
Three-dimensional echocardiography in paravalvular aortic regurgitation assessment after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jan;25(1):47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.08.019. Epub 2011 Sep 29. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012. PMID: 21962448
-
Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jan 1;6(1):48-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.975623. Epub 2012 Dec 4. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23212272
-
Meta-Analysis of Transthoracic Echocardiography Versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;124(8):1246-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.036. Epub 2019 Aug 2. Am J Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31466694 Review.
-
Comprehensive assessment of the aortic valve in critically ill patients for the non-cardiologist. Part II: Chronic aortic regurgitation of the native valve.Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(1):55-68. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.104892. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021. PMID: 33788504 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Quantitative assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 May 8;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0134-0. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015. PMID: 25953135 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Structural Aortic Valve Stenosis Procedures.J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 1;13(17):5184. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175184. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39274397 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multimodality Imaging Is Key for a Successful Paravalvular Leak Repair.JACC Case Rep. 2022 Jan 5;4(1):42-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.11.003. eCollection 2022 Jan 5. JACC Case Rep. 2022. PMID: 35036942 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Technical Challenges of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 4;8:670457. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.670457. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34150868 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Imaging of Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 29;13(11):1908. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111908. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37296760 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials